Table 2. Association of Myostatin (A55T) genotypes with clinical, biochemical, anthropometric and body composition profiles.
Parameters | A/A (1) (n = 251) | A/T (2) (n = 63) | T/T (3) (n = 21) | p value (1&2) | p value (2&3) | p value (1&3) | p value (1, 2&3) |
Age (yrs) | 37.5±8.7 | 38.5±9.9 | 37.0±6.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.4±4.4 | 27.2±3.9 | 28.3±4.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.04 |
Insulin (µU/ml) | 8.7±3.2 | 8.4±3.0 | 9.1±2.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
HOMA | 2.1±1.02 | 2.2±0.98 | 2.3±0.8 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Circumferences (cm) | |||||||
Waist | 91.4±12.0 | 93.4±11.5 | 94.4±10.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
Hip | 95.2±9.7 | 96.7±8.7 | 97.2±7.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 |
WH-R | 0.96±0.09 | 0.97±0.08 | 0.97±0.05 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
Mid thigh | 54.2±10.4 | 55.3±9.7 | 56.4±12.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Mid arm | 27.1±3.3 | 27.9±3.3 | 28.1±5.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
Neck | 35.7±4.2 | 37.1±3.1 | 33.2±3.1 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
Skinfolds thickness (mm) | |||||||
Biceps | 17.0±8.1 | 17.6±9.4 | 19.4±7.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 |
Triceps | 20±9.3 | 21.1±9.1 | 21.5±6.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
Subscapular | 39.1±8.6 | 41.2±8.9 | 40.1±10.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.09 |
Suprailiac | 38.2±13.9 | 41.3±10.3 | 45.6±11.5 | 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
Lateral thoracic | 39.3±11.2 | 40.4±12.3 | 41.1±9.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 |
TSF | 101.1±30.6 | 104.1±30.9 | 126.7±24.9 | 0.06 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.008 |
Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry | |||||||
Body fat (%) | 35.1±6.7 | 36.3±8.8 | 45.2±9.8 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Body fat (%) | 35.1±6.7 | 36.3±8.8 | 45.2±9.8 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Total lean mass (%) | 72.2±12.3 | 65.2±11.8 | 51.9±10.8 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.03 |
Total lean mass (kg) | 49.6±8.2 | 46.8±7.7 | 45.6±9.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
Total BMD (g cm−2) | 1.21±0.15 | 1.21±0.08 | 1.23±0.09 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
All values are given as mean ± standard deviation; n, number of subjects. Due to multiple comparisons within each genotype, a Bonferroni correction was applied. Statistical significance was established at a P value of 0.05. HOMA-homoeostasis model assessment; WH-R, Waist-to-hip ratio; TSF, total skinfolds (sum of four skinfold thickness); BMD, bone mineral density.