Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2012 Apr 24;69(3):708–715. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24298

Table 2.

Results of qualitative evaluation.

Evaluated Vessel Segments Vessel Visualization (1–4) Saturation Artifacts(1–4)
TOF PCASL PCASL-TOF* TOF PCASL PCASL-TOF*
Anterior cerebral artery 3.25 3.10 −0.15 3.20 3.25 0.05
Right posterior cerebral artery 3.22 3.11 −0.11 3.22 3.06 −0.16
Left posterior cerebral artery 3.10 3.05 −0.05 3.15 3.05 −0.10
Right middle cerebral artery 3.35 3.30 −0.05 3.35 3.25 −0.10
Left middle cerebral artery 3.35 3.30 −0.05 3.35 3.25 −0.10
Basilar tip 3.40 3.45 0.05 3.35 3.50 0.15
Right siphon 3.30 3.60 0.30 3.30 3.85 0.55
Left siphon 3.25 3.60 0.35 3.30 3.85 0.55
Pathology 2.80 3.50 0.70 3.00 3.60 0.60
All the above vessels excluding pathology 3.28 3.32 0.04 3.28 3.39 0.11
*

Score difference between PCASL-VIPR and 3D TOF. Positive values mean better performance of PCASL-VIPR over 3D TOF, negative values mean the opposite. Statistical significance as tested using a Wilcoxon signed rank test is indicated in bold font (P < 0.05)