Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Head Neck. 2012 Jan 13;34(12):1727–1733. doi: 10.1002/hed.21997

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics stratified by the presence of matted nodes.

Characteristics No. of patients
with matted
nodes (16)
No. of patients
with nonmatted
nodes (62)
p
value*
Age, mean (SD) 58.4 (9.2) 58.5 (8.4) .97
Subsite .83
 BOT 44% (7) 48% (30)
 Tonsil 56% (9) 50% (31)
 Postpharyngeal wall 0% (0) 2% (1)
Overall stage .11
 III 0% (0) 18% (11)
 IV 100% (16) 82% (51)
T classification .002
 T1 0% (0) 10% (6)
 T2 25% (4) 39% (24)
 T3 0% (0) 24% (15)
 T4 75% (12) 27% (17)
N classification .02
 N0 0% (0) 11% (7)
 N1 0% (0) 13% (8)
 N2a 0% (0) 10% (6)
 N2b 38% (6) 37% (23)
 N2c 31% (5) 22% (13)
 N3 31% (5) 8% (5)
HPV status .05
 Positive 63% (10) 82% (51)
 Negative 31% (5) 11% (7)
 Missing 6% (1) 7% (4)
EGFR status .1
 Positive 31% (5) 58% (36)
 Negative 38% (6) 27% (17)
 Missing 31% (5) 15% (9)
Tobacco status .18
 Never 12% (2) 27% (17)
 Prior 44% (7) 53% (33)
 Current 44% (7) 20% (12)

Abbreviations: BOT, base of tongue; HPV, human papillomavirus; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

*

The p value tests association with matted node category for each variable. Fisher exact test is used for dichotomous variables. Likelihood ratio chi-square test with Monte Carlo estimation of errors is used for variables with more than 2 levels. Missing values are excluded.

We expect this difference to be present since matted nodes are defined by characteristics present only in N2b or worse patients.