Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep;4(5):247–254. doi: 10.1177/1758834012455838

Table 2.

Subgroup analyses of patients aged at least 70 years in nonspecific clinical trials.

Author [year] Total no. of patients/no. patients ≥70 years Treatment arms Response rate <70 years/ ≥70 years (%) Median survival time <70 years/ ≥70 years 1-year survival rate <70 years/ ≥70 years (%)
Langer [2002] 574/86 CDDP + VP16 versus CDDP + Pacli 21.5/23.3* 9.1*/8.5 months 38*/29
Lilenbaum [2005] 561/155 Carbo + Pacli versus Pacli 28*/36 9*/8 months 38*/33
15/21 6.8/5.8 months 35/31
Belani [2005] 1218/401$ CDDP + Doc versus Carbo + Doc versus CDDP + VNR 11.0/12.6 months 44/52
9.7/9 months 37/39
10.1/9.9 months 41/41
Ansari [2011] 1135/338 Carbo + Gem versus Pacli + Gem versus Carbo + Pacli 30.1/28.2 7.7/8.8/8.0/ 7.2 months
24.8/24.4 8.9/9.8/5.9/ 7.8 months
9.4/8.4/6.1/ 7.9 months§
Blanchard [2011] 616/122 CDDP + VNR versus Carbo + Pacli 27/30 9/7 months (p = 0.04) 40/27
*

Global percentage or median survival time for the two arms together.

$

401 patients aged ≥65 years.

Response rate by categories of age, the three arms being combined: <70 years, 70–74 years, 75–79 years, 80 years and more.

§

Median survival by arm and age categories. No significant difference.

Carbo, carboplatin; CDDP, cisplatin; Doc, docetaxel; Gem, gemcitabine; Pacli, paclitaxel; VNR, vinorelbine; VP16, etoposide.