Table 2.
Intestinal parasite |
Study settinga |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Azaguié M’Bromé/Azaguié Makouguié (rural) |
Abbé-Begnini (peri-urban) |
Azaguié Gare (urban) |
||||
No. of infected | % (95% CI) | No. of infected | % (95% CI) | No. of infected | % (95% CI) | |
Helminths |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schistosoma mansoni |
156 |
91.8 (87.6–95.9) |
48 |
32.9 (25.2–40.6) |
69 |
53.1 (44.4–61.8) |
Schistosoma haematobium |
111 |
65.3 (58.1–72.5) |
6 |
4.1 (0.1–7.4) |
1 |
0.8 (0–2.0) |
Trichuris trichiura |
96 |
56.5 (48.9–63.9) |
10 |
6.9 (2.7–10.9) |
20 |
15.4 (9.1–21.7) |
Hookworm |
76 |
44.7 (37.2–52.3) |
60 |
41.1 (33.0–49.2) |
27 |
20.8 (13.7-27.8) |
Ascaris lumbricoides |
19 |
11.2 (6.4–15.9) |
10 |
6.9 (2.7–10.9) |
17 |
13.1 (7.2–18.9) |
Intestinal protozoa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entamoeba coli |
54 |
31.8 (24.7–38.8) |
39 |
26.7 (19.5–33.9) |
33 |
25.4 (17.8–32.9) |
Endolimax nana |
49 |
28.8 (21.9–35.7) |
36 |
24.7 (17.6–31.7) |
55 |
42.3 (33.7–50.9) |
Blastocystis hominis |
27 |
15.9 (10.7–22.3) |
14 |
9.6 (4.8–14.4) |
14 |
10.8 (5.4–16.2) |
Giardia intestinalis |
15 |
8.8 (4.5–13.1) |
11 |
7.5 (3.2–11.9) |
12 |
9.2 (4.2–12.3) |
Chilomastix mesnili |
14 |
8.2 (4.1–12.4) |
7 |
4.8 (1.3–8.3) |
6 |
4.6 (0.9–8.3) |
Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar |
14 |
8.2 (4.1–12.4) |
12 |
8.2 (3.7–12.7) |
7 |
5.4 (1.5–9.3) |
Iodamoeba bütschlii |
9 |
5.3 (1.9–8.7) |
8 |
5.5 (1.7–9.2) |
10 |
7.7 (3.1–12.3) |
Entamoeba hartmanni | 5 | 2.9 (0.4–5.5) | 8 | 5.5 (1.7–9.2) | 9 | 6.9 (2.5–11.3) |
a n = 170 (rural setting), n = 146 (peri-urban setting), n = 130 (urban setting).
Diagnosis of S. mansoni and soil-transmitted helminths were based on nine Kato-Katz thick smears (three stool samples, each subjected to triplicate Kato-Katz). Diagnosis of S. haematobium was based on three urine samples, each subjected to a single filtration. Diagnosis of intestinal protozoa was based on a single stool sample fixed in SAF that was examined with an ether-concentration technique.
CI, confidence interval.