Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 19;12:165. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-165

Table 4.

Gender-specific annual mean expenditures within the case group adjusted for age

 
Service component
Male dementia patients (n = 2,328)
Female dementia patients (n = 6,819)
p-values
    Users (as a %) Cost per user (in €) Cost per patient (in €) Users (as a %) Cost per user (in €) Cost per patient (in €) Probability of service use Cost per user
Approach 1 one-step model
Costs of formal care*
100.0
12,648
12,648
100.0
12,209
12,209
/
0.17
 
Health insurance expenditures*
100.0
6,465
6,465
100.0
5,558
5,558
/
0.002
 
 Medication
99.4
1,394
1,394
99.5
1,277
1,277
/
0.12
 
  including anti-dementia drugs
18.8
782
127
14.0
770
115
0.12
0.70
 
 General practitioner
100.0
650
650
99.5
638
638
/
0.18
Approach 2 two-part- model
 Medical specialist
88.2
675
595
79.1
447
363
<0.0001
<0.0001
 
 Hospital treatment
46.3
5,959
2,790
41.0
5,308
2,157
0.0005
0.01
 
 Non-physician services
28.3
839
225
26.5
677
190
0.25
0.03
 
 Medical aids
56.9
508
301
68.8
534
349
<0.0001
0.05
 
 Home health care
14.3
1,761
266
17.9
2,461
392
<0.0001
<0.0001
 
 Rehabilitation
5.2
3,307
170
4.6
3,459
164
0.81
0.21
  Long-term care services* 59.3 9,027 5,935 68.3 10,267 6,467 0.065 <0.0001

Per user data derive from one-step and two-step Generalized Linear Models with gender as the coefficient of interest.

Patient level data are means based on recycled predictions with gender as the coefficient of interest.

Significance at the patient level is estimated based on p1 and p2 in the two-part models and based on p2 in the one-step models.

p1 derives from the logistic model (approach 2, step 1) and p2 derives from the gamma model (approach 2, step 2 and approach 1).

* Results of model estimation; the addition of mean costs per category yields slightly different figures.