Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011 Nov 29;1818(3):776–797. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.11.015

Table 1.

Overview of the M. tuberculosis and M. leprae transporter analyses based on TC class and subclass

TC classa Class description No. of transport proteinsb Mle/Mtuc TC subclass Subclass description No. of transport proteins Mle/Mtu
Mtu Mle Mtu Mle
1 Channels 8 (8) 3 (3) 38% 1.A α-Type channels 6 (6) 2 (2) 33%
1.B β-Barrel porins 2 (2) 1 (1) 50%
2 Secondary carriers 82 (78) 26 (23) 29% 2.A Porters (uniporters, symporters, antiporters) 82 (78) 27 (23) 29%
3 Primary active transporters 132 (46) 72 (24) 52% 3.A P–P-bond-hydrolysis-driven transporters 111 (43) 66 (23) 53%
3.D Oxidoreduction-driven transporters 21 (3) 6 (1) 33%
4 Group Translocaters 1 (1) 0 (0) 0% 4.C Acyl-CoA ligase-coupled transporters 1 (1) 0 (0) 0%
5 Transmembrane electron carriers 8 (4) 1 (1) 25% 5.A Transmembrane two-electron transfer carriers 8 (4) 1 (1) 25%
8 Auxiliary transport proteins 1 (1) 1 (1) 100% 8.A Auxiliary transport proteins 1 (1) 1 (1) 100%
9 Poorly defined systemsd 53 (9) 33 (3) 33% 9.A Recognized transporters of unknown biochemical mechanism 53 (9) 33 (3) 33%
Total 285(147) 136 (55) 37% 285 (147) 136 (55) 37%
a

Transporter classes 6 and 7 have not been assigned in the TC system and therefore are absent.

b

Numbers in parentheses represent the number of transport systems. Transport systems are comprised ofone or more constituent transport proteins.

c

Relative reduction in transport systems from Mtu to Mle.

d

Poorly defined systems here includes families in TC subclass 9.A (poorly characterized transporters) but not in TC subclass 9.B (putative transporters); see Tables 3, S1 and S2 for homologues of families within subclass 9.B.