Table 1.
Mean distances (mm) | Group | Mean | Standard error | Minimum | Median | Maximum | Cases | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outer area PM | CAST | −0.024 | 0.005 | −0.047 | −0.021 | 0.003 | 10 | p < 0.01 |
PIB | −0.002 | 0.001 | −0.008 | −0.003 | 0.006 | 10 | ||
Inner area PM | CAST | 0.028 | 0.004 | 0.010 | 0.030 | 0.046 | 10 | p < 0.01 |
PIB | −0.008 | 0.002 | −0.019 | −0.008 | 0.000 | 10 | ||
Total PM | CAST | 0.001 | 0.003 | −0.010 | 0.000 | 0.014 | 10 | p = 0.13 |
PIB | −0.005 | 0.001 | −0.007 | −0.005 | 0.000 | 10 | ||
Outer area M | CAST | −0.016 | 0.005 | −0.046 | −0.013 | 0.006 | 10 | p = 0.02 |
PIB | −0.001 | 0.003 | −0.015 | −0.001 | 0.012 | 10 | ||
Inner area M | CAST | 0.026 | 0.008 | −0.005 | 0.024 | 0.082 | 10 | p < 0.01 |
PIB | −0.007 | 0.002 | −0.018 | −0.006 | 0.000 | 10 | ||
Total M | CAST | 0.006 | 0.005 | −0.013 | 0.005 | 0.045 | 10 | p = 0.23 |
PIB | −0.004 | 0.002 | −0.016 | −0.003 | 0.003 | 10 | ||
Total PM and M | CAST | 0.003 | 0.003 | −0.010 | −0.002 | 0.026 | 10 | p = 0.07 |
PIB | −0.005 | 0.001 | −0.011 | −0.004 | 0.000 | 10 |
CAD: computer-aided design; CAM: computer-aided manufacturing; inner area = towards the pontic; outer area: mesial/distal areas of the bridge; M: molar; PIB: procera implant bridge; PM: premolar; ROIs: regions of interest; total: average of inner and outer areas.
The PM and M implant surfaces were virtually cut into half resulting in four different areas for fit assessment.