Table 1. Cotesia glomerata; time series.
Time after conditioning | Treatment | ||
1 h | Conditioning treatment | X2 2 = 16.25 | P<0.001 |
• P. rapae on nasturtium | |||
• P. brassicae on nasturtium | |||
• P. brassicae on Brussels sprouts | |||
Block (experimental day)* | X2 3 = 11.30 | P<0.001 | |
4 h | Conditioning treatment | X2 2 = 4.17 | P = 0.016 |
• P. rapae on nasturtium | |||
• P. brassicae on nasturtium | |||
• P. brassicae on Brussels sprouts | |||
Block (experimental day)* | X2 3 = 3.00 | P = 0.030 | |
24 h | Host-species | X2 1 = 2.41 | P = 0.121 |
• P. rapae | |||
• P. brassicae | |||
Plant species used for conditioning | X2 1 = 43.79 | P<0.001 | |
• nasturtium | |||
• Brussels sprouts | |||
Host-species * plant species used for conditioning | X2 1 = 6.49 | P = 0.011 | |
Block (experimental day)* | X2 5 = 1.35 | P = 0.238 |
None of the interaction effects between block and treatment factors were significant (α = 0.05).
GLM with binomial distribution of error variance and a logit-link function. Response variable: Percentage choice for nasturtium (Fig. 1).