Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep;33(8):1579–1585. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3083

Table 2:

Assessment of intersubject alignmenta

Similarity DARTEL + LI (n = 54) DARTEL − LI (n = 54) P (DARTEL + LI vs DARTEL − LI) USM + LI (n = 54) USM − LI (n = 54) P (USM + LI vs USM − LI)
NMI 1.2630 (0.0064) 1.2602 (0.0063) <.0001 1.1998 (0.0063) 1.1981 (0.0062) <.0001
CC 0.9675 (0.0039) 0.9669 (0.0040) <.0001 0.9090 (0.0106) 0.9084 (0.0107) <.0001
a

Values are mean (SD). Overall, DARTEL showed higher NMI and CC (P < .0001) compared with USM.