Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 9;2012:489690. doi: 10.1155/2012/489690

Table 1.

Food intake efficiency during allicin administration (n = 6).

Week 1 2 3 11 12
Controld 100 ± 2.1 100 ± 3.7 100 ± 1.4 100 ± 4.9 100 ± 6.0
5 mg/kg allicine 90.3 ± 2.7a 88.1 ± 4.2 80.0 ± 2.3a 70.7 ± 5.9a 82.0 ± 4.7
10 mg/kg allicine 54.3 ± 0.5b 74.2 ± 11.7a 68.9 ± 1.6b 80.5 ± 3.1a 80.1 ± 4.3
20 mg/kg allicine 42.0 ± 1.3c 65.5 ± 5.7b 53.0 ± 3.3b 65.4 ± 3.2b 67.7 ± 2.4a
Normal (regular diet)e 89.9 ± 12.8a 85.6 ± 2.6a 82.3 ± 4.0a 93.4 ± 14.8 82.7 ± 15.9

The data are mean ± S.D. and significantly different at a P < 0.05, b P < 0.01, and c P < 0.001 by the unpaired Student's t-test.

dThe high cholesterol control group, 200 μL PBS (pH 7.4) was served instead of allicin as a negative control.

eThe results are expressed as % of the high cholesterol control.