Table 1.
Procedure | Advantages | Potential limitations |
---|---|---|
STANDARD TESTING | ||
Pulmonary functional testing | • Non-invasive | • Sensitivity |
• Cost | • Indirect measurements of inflammation | |
• Standardized procedure | ||
• Availability | ||
• Longitudinal assessment possible | ||
Blood biomarkers | • Non-invasive | • Correlation with lung inflammation unknown |
• Cost | ||
• Availability | ||
• Longitudinal assessment possible | ||
• Cellular/biochemical readouts of inflammation | ||
ADDITIONAL TESTS1 | ||
Exhaled gases and breath condensates | • Non-invasive | • Correlation with inflammation not clear |
• Cost | ||
• Availability | • Predicted value references not available | |
• Standardized procedure | ||
• Longitudinal assessment possible | • High variability | |
Sputum induction | • Non-invasive | • Sample yield |
• Cost | • Reproducibility | |
• Longitudinal assessment possible | • Correlation with tissue unknown | |
• Cellular/biochemical readouts of inflammation | ||
Imaging modalities | • Correlation with tissue changes | • Availability |
• Cost | ||
• Sensitivity | ||
• Safety/ethical concerns | ||
Bronchoalveolar lavage | • Standardized procedure | • Moderately invasive |
• Cost | • Correlation with tissue unknown | |
• Reproducible | • Nature of cell infiltrate may vary between diseases | |
• Longitudinal assessment possible | ||
• Cellular/biochemical readouts of inflammation | ||
Endo- and trans-bronchial biopsies | • Standardized procedure | • Invasive |
• Tissue/cellular/biochemical readouts of inflammation | • Focal analysis/sampling error |
The tests in this category are reviewed from less invasive methods to more invasive procedures.