Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: Popul Res Policy Rev. 2011 Aug;30(4):537–567. doi: 10.1007/s11113-010-9200-3

Table 3.

Odds ratios for labor market migration from new and emerging destinations, zero-order and interaction models estimated separately for 24 origin Groups (odds ratios)

New destinations (LoC_HiG)
Emerging destinations (LoC_LoG)
Zero-order model Interaction model Zero-order model Interaction model
Mexico 1.91 0.82 2.48 0.80
Cuba 2.46 0.70 1.31 0.78
El Salvador 2.39 1.00 2.20 1.04
Dominican Republic 3.33 1.36 7.08 1.78
Colombia 3.60 1.52 1.65 1.06
Guatemala 2.40 0.89 2.45 1.05
Ecuador 2.85 0.97 2.09 1.08
Honduras 1.96 1.13 2.54 1.20
Peru 3.11 0.89 2.34 0.91
Nicaragua 2.30 0.74 2.83 0.91
Brazil 2.71 1.26 2.67 1.47
Philippines 3.02 1.14 2.50 1.06
China 6.06 1.37 9.81 1.34
India 3.21 0.98 3.87 1.16
Vietnam 2.37 0.90 2.65 0.98
Korea 3.50 1.00 3.75 0.99
Taiwan 1.72 0.77 2.31 0.94
Iran 2.29 0.94 2.29 1.06
Pakistan 3.30 1.46 2.79 1.39
Laos 0.98 0.87 0.77 0.91
Jamaica 5.15 2.01 2.57 1.78
Haiti 3.82 1.51 2.42 1.51
Guyana 4.09 1.57 2.72 1.53
Canada 2.10 1.18 1.59 1.00

Note: Bold represent statistical significance at 0.05 level or higher level. The zero-order and interaction models were estimated separately for 24 national origin groups. Traditional labor markets were the reference category for both sets of models