1
|
Issue/topic selection
|
General requirements:
|
a) issue of importance/social significance
|
b) lack of publicly accessible dialogue among stakeholders, contributing to, or resulting in some form of challenge, controversy, problem or obstacle.
|
2
|
Introductory filmed interviews (documenting perspectives)
|
- in-depth open-ended filmed interviews conducted with each participant
|
- Purposive sampling strategy: looking for a range of perspectives on a topic
|
- Documentation of “baseline” positions to permit analysis of changes in positions/perspectives as a result of participation in theBrokered Dialogue
|
3
|
Identification of preliminary dialogue domains
|
- combined approach of reviewing initial filmed interviews and written transcripts (open coding)
|
- identification of emergent themes and patterns within and between participants’ accounts (constant comparison)
|
4
|
‘First cut’ edits
|
- based on initial analysis, first ‘cuts’ of individual interviews assembled
|
- resultant film clips highlight key points of individual participants’ perspectives on topic
|
- participatory editing process ensures participants are comfortable showing clips to other participants (decisions recorded)
|
5
|
Responses to first cuts
|
- first cut clips shared with other participants and responses filmed
|
6
|
Analysis of responsive sessions and ‘second cut’ edits
|
- building on initial analysis, review of responses and written transcripts (as per step 3 above)
|
- focus oninteractionwith perspectives of others
|
- results in a ‘second cut’ of footage from responses (as per step 4 above – including participatory editing)
|
7
|
Repeat
|
- The number of iterations depends on the complexity of the issue and dialogue, and the feasibility of continued iterations
|
8
|
Rough cut and assembly
|
- review of all approved footage, related transcripts by research team
|
- iterative analysis between filmed footage and transcripts (constant comparison)
|
- final decisions regarding inclusion of perspective-sharing/response/rebuttal (selective coding)
|
- interview segments assembled to approximate dialogue
|
- Aim is:
|
- (a) present unique insights arising from the dialogue
|
- (b) fair representation of the normative structure of the dialogue
|
- (c) reflect any evolution or change of perspective for individual participants that have become apparent over the course of theBrokered Dialogue
|
8
|
Revisions and approval
|
- Rough cut assembly viewed by each participant
|
- participants provide editorial feedback, can request edits to own footage (edits incorporated)
|
- Each participant must provide approval for use of their footage
|
9
|
Final Cut and post-production
|
-Final versions of the film are prepared.
|
|
|
-The length and content can be tailored to specific uses, e.g., teaching vs. a presentation at a public forum |