Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 23;109(34):E2284–E2293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202174109

Table 1.

Differential expression of HDACs in starvation vs. control conditions

Symbol Av control* Av starved* t test Ctrl/Strv +/−Y +/−M/C M/C vs. Y§
HDAC1 12,497 ± 20% 12,609 ± 27% 0.97 0.99 / / /
HDAC2 8,913 ± 9% 9,190 ± 22% 0.74 0.97 / / /
HDAC3 2,425 ± 16% 2,360 ± 12% 0.68 1.03 / / /
HDAC4 1,476 ± 26% 341 ± 69% 0.03 4.33 2.12 13.13 6.20
HDAC6 587 ± 12% 420 ± 5% 0.01 1.40 1.39 1.41 1.01
HDAC8 545 ± 7% 502 ± 18% 0.46 1.09 / / /
SIRT1 1,516 ± 10% 1,706 ± 34% 0.49 0.89 / / /
SIRT2 #1 254 ± 6% 258 ± 9% 0.80 0.98 / / /
SIRT2 #2 301 ± 7% 305 ± 10% 0.85 0.98 / / /
SIRT4 435 ± 30% 931 ± 21% 0.01 0.47 0.45 0.48 1.06
SIRT5 #1 372 ± 11% 281 ± 23% 0.15 1.32 / / /
SIRT5 #2 1,358 ± 9% 666 ± 19% 0.01 2.04 2.58 1.65 0.64
SIRT7 470 ± 11% 870 ± 33% 0.09 0.54 / / /

Av, average; Ctrl, control; SIRT, sirtuin; Strv, starved; #, arbitrary number assigned to distinguish multiple probes referring to the same gene; /, not calculated.

*Average ± SD of signal values generated by Illumina microarrays for control or starved HeLa and HeLa-OA1myc cells.

Paired two-tailed Student t test of starved vs. control group. Bold numbers indicate significant values and correspond to genes that are differentially expressed in the two conditions.

Ratio of mean signal values in control group (+) vs. starved group (−) for either Y or M/C deprivation conditions.

§Ratio of M/C vs. Y differential expression.