Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 24;7(8):e43694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043694

Table 2. Word-pair semantic similarity measurement.

Word pair Human [43] α = 0 α = −0.5 α = 0.5
car-automobile 3.92 1.000 1.000 1.000
gem-jewel 3.84 1.000 1.000 1.000
coast-shore 3.7 0.548 0.313 0.702
magician-wizard 3.5 0.369 0.103 0.577
food-fruit 3.08 0.656 0.249 0.833
bird-crane 2.97 0.728 0.291 0.911
brother-monk 2.82 0.369 0.354 0.572
cemetery-woodland 0.95 0.117 0.033 0.360
food-rooster 0.89 0.622 0.083 0.902
coast-hill 0.87 0.377 0.051 0.651
forest-graveyard 0.84 0.188 0.061 0.451
shore-woodland 0.63 0.270 0.085 0.572
monk-slave 0.55 0.447 0.128 0.750
coast-forest 0.42 0.451 0.208 0.683
chord-smile 0.13 0.114 0.020 0.432
glass-magician 0.11 0.199 0.035 0.501
noon-string 0.08 0.232 0.050 0.486

We used the subset of pairs provided in reference [43] (Human judgment column), and reproduced for comparison purposes in reference [42], that are found in the giant component of SEW. RIM cosine similarities are listed for three different weighting schemes parameterized by Inline graphic (see Eq. (5)).