Table 3. Comparative analysis of the genotyping methods applied to study the clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains circulating in Kaohsiung in southern Taiwan.
Typing methods, Strain group | Number of genotypes in total | No. of unique genotypes | No. of clusters | No. of strains in clusters | HGDI value |
Spoligotyping | |||||
All strains | 46 | 29 | 17 | 2-91 | 0.758 |
Beijing strain only | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3-91 | 0.063 |
Non-Beijing strains | 41 | 26 | 15 | 2-62 | 0.768 |
VNTR analysis, all strains | |||||
12-MIRU-VNTR | 91 | 69 | 22 | 2-52 | 0.917 |
24-MIRU-VNTR | 174 | 150 | 24 | 2-10 | 0.995 |
Spoligotyping+12-MIRU | |||||
All strains | 113 | 95 | 18 | 2-43 | 0.937 |
Beijing strains only | 42 | 33 | 9 | 3-35 | 0.863 |
Spoligotyping+24-MIRU | |||||
All strains | 181 | 159 | 22 | 2-9 | 0.996 |
Beijing strains only | 80 | 72 | 8 | 2-5 | 0.994 |