Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 24;7(8):e43018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043018

Table 3. Comparative analysis of the genotyping methods applied to study the clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains circulating in Kaohsiung in southern Taiwan.

Typing methods, Strain group Number of genotypes in total No. of unique genotypes No. of clusters No. of strains in clusters HGDI value
Spoligotyping
All strains 46 29 17 2-91 0.758
Beijing strain only 5 3 2 3-91 0.063
Non-Beijing strains 41 26 15 2-62 0.768
VNTR analysis, all strains
12-MIRU-VNTR 91 69 22 2-52 0.917
24-MIRU-VNTR 174 150 24 2-10 0.995
Spoligotyping+12-MIRU
All strains 113 95 18 2-43 0.937
Beijing strains only 42 33 9 3-35 0.863
Spoligotyping+24-MIRU
All strains 181 159 22 2-9 0.996
Beijing strains only 80 72 8 2-5 0.994