Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 25;6:239. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00239

Table 3.

Functional ROI analysis.

DLPFC L MLPFC L VLPFC L DLPFC R VLPFC R SFG
High vs. low abstraction t = 2.33*, p = 0.02 t = −0.59, p = 0.70 t = 0.22, p = 0.41 t = 2.73*, p = 0.01 t = −0.31, p = 0.6 t = −0.14, p = 0.56
High vs. low emotion t = −0.99, p = 0.83 t = −1.18, p = 0.87 t = 2.60*, p = 0.01 t = 0.12, p = 0.45 t = 2.28*, p = 0.02 t = 1.98*, p = 0.03
Interaction t = −0.06, p = 0.52 t = 1.94*, p = 0.03 t = 1.38, p = 0.09 t = 0.60, p = 0.28 t = −0.48, p = 0.68 t = −1.39, p = 0.91
Cluster size 1531 595 161 252 24 300

Abbreviations:

L

left

R

right

DLPFC

Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

MLPFC

Mediolateral Prefrontal Cortex

VLPFC

Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex

SFG

Superior Frontal Gyrus.

Significance values are one-sided. The asterisk“

*

” marks results significant at p = 0.05, one sided. Cluster size in 2 × 2 × 2 mm voxels.