Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 25;83(4):394–400. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.712890

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Sample double-examination results for one patient, depicting overlaid implant positions from each RSA examination (gray and magenta), which should be identical. The mismatch in the tibial component (A) showed high imprecision of the system due to the symmetry of the implant. Simplification of the implant to its spherical tip (B) greatly improves the precision. The position of the talar component (C) was precisely repeated in this double examination.