Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 22;7(6):660–666. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss048

Table 3.

Results of group comparison

Voxels T Z x y z Area
High vs low alexithymia
    Anterior
        36 5.23 4.48 −33 −84 24 L superior occipital gyrus
        87 5.22 4.47 39 −81 27 R superior occipital gyrus
        22 4.08 3.67 −27 −75 −27 L declive
    Middle
        44 5.66 4.75 −36 −15 36 L precentral gyrus
        37 4.83 4.21 −6 −9 60 L precentral gyrus
        27 4.55 4.02 33 0 30 R IFG
    Posterior
        30 3.93 3.56 −6 −9 60 L precentral gyrus
        20 3.83 3.48 57 0 45 R MiFG
Low alexithymia vs high alexithymia
    Anterior
        47 4.93 4.28 0 24 39 Cingulate gyrus
        23 4.59 4.05 27 36 24 R SFG
        16 4.33 3.86 −30 63 3 L SFG
        33 4.21 3.77 39 −3 −36 R MTG
    Middle
        42 4.61 4.06 30 27 27 R MiFG
    Posterior
        16 4.34 3.87 −9 66 18 L MeFG
        15 4.04 3.65 15 66 −6 R SFG

Overview of clusters showing connectivity differences between groups (P < 0.001; k > 15, inclusive mask at P < 0.05). The first part of the table shows areas that are more connected in alexithymia, and the second half areas of decreased connectivity. Anterior, middle and posterior refer to the different components of the DMN (L = left, R = right).