Table 2.
Local significance levels (in %) of A: weighted Bonferroni (B: parametric, C: consonant parametric with δ=0.0783) test for the example from Figure 1 and α=0.025
| Intersection hypothesis | Local significance levels (in %) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | |
| H1∩H2∩H3∩H4 | 1.25 (1.35,1.35) | 1.25 (1.35,1.35) | 0 (0,0) | 0 (0,0) |
| H1∩H2∩H3 | 1.25 (1.35,1.35) | 1.25 (1.35,1.35) | 0 (0,0) | – |
| H1∩H2∩H4 | 1.25 (1.35,1.35) | 1.25 (1.35,1.35) | – | 0 (0,0) |
| H1∩H2 | 1.25 (1.35,1.35) | 1.25 (1.35,1.35) | – | – |
| H1∩H3∩H4 | 1.25 (1.25,1.35) | – | 0 (0,0) | 1.25 (1.25,1.15) |
| H1∩H3 | 2.50 (2.50,2.50) | – | 0 (0,0) | – |
| H1∩H4 | 1.25 (1.25,1.35) | – | – | 1.25 (1.25,1.15) |
| H1 | 2.50 (2.50,2.50) | – | – | – |
| H2∩H3∩H4 | – | 1.25 (1.25,1.35) | 1.25 (1.25,1.15) | 0 (0,0) |
| H2∩H3 | – | 1.25 (1.25,1.35) | 1.25 (1.25,1.15) | – |
| H2∩H4 | – | 2.50 (2.50,2.50) | – | 0 (0,0) |
| H2 | – | 2.50 (2.50,2.50) | – | – |
| H3∩H4 | – | – | 1.25 (1.35,1.35) | 1.25 (1.35,1.35) |
| H3 | – | – | 2.50 (2.50,2.50) | – |
| H4 | – | – | – | 2.50 (2.50,2.50) |