Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2012 Mar 3;51(3):259–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.018

Table 1.

Percent of CTC coalition leaders reporting that CTC Milestones & Benchmarks were achieved in 2007, the 4th year of the intervention, and in 2009, 20 months after study support ended.

CTC Coalitions
CTC Stage 2007 2009+
CTC Stage 2: Organize, Introduce, & Involve (Scale 0-3) 2.82 2.55
Does the coalition use a risk/protective framework? 100% 91%
Has the coalition received training in the risk/protective framework? 100% 100%
Have 75% or more coalition members been trained in the risk/protective framework? 83% 64%
CTC Stage 3: Develop a Community Profile (Scale 0-5) 4.82 4.73
Has the coalition assessed risk and protective factors in the community? 100% 100%
...using student surveys? 100% 100%
...using archival indicators? 92% 73%
Has the coalition focused on any specific risk or protective factors? 100% 100%
Has the coalition assessed prevention resources in the community? 92% 100%
CTC Stage 4: Create Community Action Plan (Scale 0-1) 0.91 0.55
Did the coalition develop an explicit, written action plan? 92% 55%
CTC Stage 5: Implement & Evaluate the Action Plan (Scale 0-6) 4.55 4.18
Were specific programs implemented to address these factors? 100% 91%
Did the coalition sponsor at least two TEPs? 100% 82%
Has the coalition evaluated or monitored the results of these programs? 100% 91%
...using pre/post surveys? 100% 82%
...using changes in participant outcomes (e.g., delinquency, school performance) 92% 82%
...using changes in participant risk and protective factors? 67% 73%
CTC Milestones & Benchmarks Total (Scale 0-15) 13.10 12.00

*p<.05 **p<.01

+

20 months after study funding ended