Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 9;2011:274736. doi: 10.1155/2011/274736

Table 2.

Factors influencing outcome of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs).

Study Year n Factors associated with “good outcome” Factors associated with “poor outcome”
Reuber et al. [11] 2007 48 Better education, motionless spells, shorter history of condition, attending clinic accompanied
Sigurdardottir and Olafsson [3] 2007 22 None statistically significant Comorbid psychiatric disorders, negativism (passive avoidant behaviour, dissatisfaction with daily life)
Carton et al. [12] 2003 84 Relief reaction to diagnosis, employment Lack of acceptance/understanding of diagnosis, continuation of AEDs therapy
An et al. [14] 2010 64 Young age at onset None statistically significant
Ettinger et al. [17] 1999 43 Good social support, good relationships with peers as a child Pending litigation
Ettinger et al. [28] 1999 76 Accepting the diagnosis None statistically significant
Irwin et al. [7] 2000 35 None statistically significant Comorbid epilepsy
Kanner et al. [22] 1999 45 Single major depressive episode Recurrent episodes of depression, personality disorder, dissociative symptoms, chronic abuse (physical/emotional/sexual)
McDade and Brown [8] 1992 16 None statistically significant IQ < 80, past history of violent behaviour
McKenzie et al. [10] 2010 260 Bullying as the antecedent, male gender, learning disability Depression/anxiety, social security payments, women, PNES only medically unexplained symptom
Meierkord et al. [15] 1991 70 Female gender, independent lifestyle, absence of comorbid epilepsy Male gender, coexisting epilepsy
Reuber et al. [11] 2003 164 Low scores on self-report measures of inhibitedness, compulsivity, somatization, depersonalization Co-morbid epilepsy, poorer education, loss of consciousness, motor features, older age at onset/diagnosis
Selwa et al. [20] 2002 85 Catatonic type, shorter duration of condition Thrashing type
Silva et al. [16] 2001 17 Acceptance of diagnosis, independent lifestyle None statistically significant
Wyllie et al. [5] 1990 21 None statistically significant None statistically significant