Table 1.
Results of CNV calling based on different training sample batches for CNVhac and Birdsuite
|
Birdsuite |
CNVhac |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1§ | G2 | G3 | I¶ | U† | Ratio‡ | G1 | G2 | G3 | I | U | Ratio | |
| NA12156 |
17 |
19 |
21 |
14 |
22 |
0.64 |
15 |
17 |
18 |
15 |
17 |
0.88 |
| NA12878 |
22 |
21 |
19 |
15 |
28 |
0.54 |
29 |
26 |
24 |
20 |
33 |
0.61 |
| NA18507 |
19 |
15 |
20 |
10 |
23 |
0.43 |
16 |
20 |
20 |
15 |
21 |
0.71 |
| NA18517 |
20 |
21 |
21 |
14 |
25 |
0.56 |
21 |
21 |
18 |
16 |
23 |
0.7 |
| NA18555 |
16 |
16 |
15 |
11 |
20 |
0.55 |
16 |
14 |
17 |
11 |
18 |
0.61 |
| NA18956 | 13 | 12 | 16 | 9 | 16 | 0.6 | 20 | 21 | 24 | 16 | 24 | 0.67 |
§The number of predicted CNVs using group 1 for parameter training.
¶The number of CNVs in intersection set of “G1”, “G2” and “G3”.
†The number of CNVs in union set of “G1”, “G2” and “G3”.
‡The ratio of intersection to union.