Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jan;63(1):19–25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100034

Table 2.

Logistic regression model of medication adoption in publicly funded substance abuse treatment programs

Variable Unstandardized coefficient SE Odds ratio 95% CI p
Perceived state policy environment
 Single State Agency’s support for medications .81 .24 2.25 1.40–3.64 .001
 Awareness of state funding policies for medications (reference: neither Medicaid nor state contract funding)
  Medicaid but not state contract funding 1.10 .51 3.00 1.12–8.11 .03
  State contract funding but not Medicaid .69 .61 2.00 .60–6.64 .26
  Both Medicaid and state contract funding 1.37 .59 3.92 1.23–12.54 .02
Organizational characteristics
 Government owned (reference: privately owned) .33 .54 1.40 .49–4.00 .54
 Located in health care setting (reference: nonhealth care setting) .64 .54 1.89 .66–5.40 .23
 Accredited by external organization (reference: not accredited) 1.13 .41 3.09 1.39–6.85 .005
 Detoxification services (reference: none) 1.42 .59 4.13 1.31–13.03 .02
 Only outpatient treatment (reference: not outpatient only) −.59 .44 .55 .23–1.31 .18
 Number of physicians on staff 1.05 .33 2.85 1.48–5.49 .002
 Number of physicians on contract .66 .23 1.94 1.24–3.02 .003
 Number of nurses on staff .40 .14 1.49 1.14–1.96 .004
 12-step treatment orientation −.19 .20 .82 .56–1.22 .33
Constant −4.77 .96