Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep;130(3):437–444. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3353

TABLE 3.

Adjusted Differences Between 2003 and 2006 Law Change Categories in Within-Student Change in BMI or Weight Statusa

Weight Measure 2003–2006 Lawb βc 95% CI P Value
BMI
No change–weak −0.32 −0.70, 0.05 .09
No change–strong −0.44 −0.71, −0.18 .002
New laws–weak −0.39 −0.56, −0.22 .001
New laws–strong −0.10 −0.33, 0.12 .36
Weaker laws −0.04 −0.24, 0.15 .66
Overweight
No change–weak −4.0 −9.8, 1.8 .17
No change–strong −3.6 −7.5, 0.3 .07
New laws–weak −4.5 −6.0, −3.0 .001
New laws–strong −2.8 −5.5, −0.2 .04
Weaker laws −3.2 −6.3, −0.1 .04
Obesity
No change–weak −1.2 −4.8, 2.5 .52
No change–strong −0.9 −3.4, 1.6 .46
New laws–weak −0.8 −2.7, 1.1 .40
New laws–strong 0.0 −1.8, 2.0 .94
Weaker laws −0.4 −5.1, 4.3 .88
a

Referent: States with mean rating = 0 for elementary school laws in 2003 and middle school laws in 2006.

b

Difference between mean rating for state elementary school laws in 2003 and middle school laws in 2006. No change–weak: Equal mean rating (1–2). No change–strong: Equal mean rating (>2). New laws–weak: Mean higher for 2006 middle school laws (1–2). New laws–strong: Mean higher for 2006 middle school laws (>2). Weaker: Mean lower for 2006 middle school laws.

c

Absolute difference in average within-student change in BMI or probability of overweight/obesity, based on fixed-effect model, adjusted for locale and SES.