Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 24;3:282. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00282

Table 5.

Evaluation of different field devices for genotype study/screening in response to drought.

Field devices for drought study Cost Strengths Limitations Suitable climate and soils Reference
Late planting with drainage in rainy season trial Large uniform field management High chance of reproductive and terminal drought Photoperiod non-sensitive Semi-arid tropics Pantuwan et al. (2002a)
Dry-season trial Large uniform field management High chance of drought, vegetative drought Photoperiod non-sensitive, genotype-by-season interaction Semi-arid tropics Pantuwan et al. (2004)
Line-source sprinkler Equipment, water source, monitoring Different water regimes Wind, space Semi-arid to arid climate Garrity and O’Toole (1994)
Rainout shelter Construction All types of drought Space, cost Lilley and Fukai (1994)
Greenhouse Construction All types of drought Space, cost, rhizosphere differences (small and loose) Yadav et al. (1997), Wade et al. (2000)
Root restriction Rhizosphere manipulation Evaluation of non-root traitsa Space Hardpan, simulated lowland Kato et al. (2007)
Raised bed Rhizosphere manipulation Dry surface soil (interrupt capillary water) Space Sub-humid climate Kato et al. (2007)

(Source: Kamoshita et al., 2008).

aRestriction of the root zone removes the advantage of deep rooted varieties that would be expressed if no restriction; in most puddled lowland fields roots are restricted.