Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 28;7(8):e43101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043101

Table 3. Experiment 2: Mean correct reaction times (in milliseconds) on the letter identification task as a function of WML, target to distractor distance, congruency type, and WMC Groups.

Target-to-distractor distance
1 2 3 4
Low WMC
Low WML Congruent 597 (125) 605 (122) 596 (124) 586 (124)
Incongruent 654 (140) 624 (137) 632 (140) 627 (138)
Congruency Effect 57 (54) 10 (63) 36 (47) 41 (45)
High WML Congruent 607 (105) 600 (131) 613 (139) 607 (119)
Incongruent 666 (135) 636 (139) 631 (120) 609 (107)
Congruency Effect 59 (53) 36 (50) 18 (56) 2 (41)
High WMC
Low WML Congruent 593 (87) 592 (95) 570 (89) 587 (90)
Incongruent 635 (98) 608 (86) 602 (100) 600 (97)
Congruency Effect 43 (57) 16 (40) 33 (45) 15 (51)
High WML Congruent 591 (89) 585 (91) 572 (69) 579 (82)
Incongruent 633 (88) 594 (79) 596 (78) 612 (94)
Congruency Effect 42 (78) 9 (38) 24 (51) 33 (34)

Values in brackets are Standard Deviations.