Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 28;7(8):e43101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043101

Table 4. Experiment 2: Mean error rates on the letter identification task as a function of WML, target to distractor distance, congruency type, and WMC groups.

Target-distractor distance
1 2 3 4
Low WMC
Low WML Congruent 0.10 (0.09) 0.1 (0.08) 0.09 (0.12) 0.11 (0.11)
Incongruent 0.16 (0.11) 0.14 (0.12) 0.12 (0.11) 0.11 (0.10)
Congruency Effect 0.06 (0.09) 0.04 (0.08) 0.03 (0.09) 0.00 (0.07)
High WML Congruent 0.11 (0.11) 0.1 (0.08) 0.14 (0.09) 0.08 (0.08)
Incongruent 0.15 (0.10) 0.12 (0.10) 0.12 (0.09) 0.11 (0.08)
Congruency Effect 0.04 (0.11) 0.02 (0.09) 0.02 (0.08) 0.02 (0.08)
High WMC
Low WML Congruent 0.08 (0.08) 0.08 (0.08) 0.09 (0.09) 0.10 (0.09)
Incongruent 0.11 (0.08) 0.10 (0.09) 0.09 (0.09) 0.11 (0.10)
Congruency Effect 0.03 (0.09) 0.02 (0.09) 0.00 (0.07) 0.02 (0.08)
High WML Congruent 0.06 (0.07) 0.07 (0.07) 0.07 (0.06) 0.06 (0.09)
Incongruent 0.12 (0.09) 0.11 (0.10) 0.10 (0.11) 0.08 (0.09)
Congruency Effect 0.06 (0.09) 0.03 (0.07) 0.03 (0.07) 0.02 (0.08)

Values in brackets are Standard Deviations.