Table 2.
hIP1 | hIP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
left | right | left | right | |
II | 8.4 | 8.9 | 8.0 | 9.3 |
III | 45.5 | 45.4 | 37.3 | 38.4 |
IV | 7.4 | 7.4 | 8.3 | 8.3 |
V | 19.1 | 19.1 | 22.0 | 21.3 |
VI | 19.6 | 19.2 | 24.4 | 22.7 |
The layer width of layer III was significantly greater in hIP1compared to hIP2.