Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Radiat Isot. 2011 Dec 29;70(4):743–751. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.12.032

Table 5.

Contribution of various sources of error to random uncertainty and to bias of the SRP-68-01 calibration factor for 131I in thyroid.

Source of error Standard deviationa for age group
Newborn 1 yr 5 yr 10 yr 15 yr Adult
Random uncertainty
 Variability of scale coefficient ±0.05
 Variability of thyroid mass +0.03/−0.06 +0.04/−0.04 +0.05/−0.08 +0.09/−0.05 +0.08/−0.03 +0.07/−0.03
 Statistical uncertainty ±0.01 ±0.01 ±0.01 ±0.01 ±0.02 ±0.02
Overall uncertainty due to all sourcesb 0.08 0.06 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.09
Bias due to errors in geometry of measurement
 Shift away from the neck +0.31 +0.32 +0.31 +0.27 +0.23 +0.18
 Vertical shift along the neck +0.03c +0.03 +0.03 −0.02 −0.06 −0.07
 Inclination in the vertical planed +0.12 +0.16 +0.14 +0.13 +0.10 +0.08
 Inclination in the horizontal plane +0.05 +0.09 +0.04 +0.03 +0.04 +0.05
Overall bias due to all sources 0.51 0.60 0.52 0.41 0.31 0.24
a

Relative to a mean of 1 for each source of error.

b

Maximal error due to variability of thyroid mass was used to calculate overall uncertainty.

c

Error was assumed to be the same as that for age 1 yr.

d

Error is slightly asymmetrical relative to the “normal” position of the detector. Value averaged over position in both directions is given.