Table 1. Detection of harbor porpoise DNA using qPCR at a controlled site (Fjord&Belt pen) and at natural sites.
Acoustic detection | Genetic detection | ||
Location | % Porpoise positive days | Positive PCRs | Cycle threshold |
Positive control (DNA extracted from skin) | 3/3 | 18, 18, 18 | |
Fjord&Bælt pen | 3/3 | 34, 35, 35 | |
<10 m from F&B pen | 1/3 | 49 | |
>10 m from F&B pen | 0/3 | - | |
Site 1 | 94 | 1/3 | 49 |
Site 2 | 42 | 0/3 | - |
Site 3 | 63 | 0/3 | - |
Site 4 | 6 | 0/3 | - |
Site 5 | 0 | 0/3 | - |
Site 6 | 0 | 0/3 | - |
Site 7 | 0 | 2/3 | 38*, 50* |
Site 8 | 79 | 0/3 | - |
Genetic detections at the eight natural sites are compared with acoustic detection rates based on data from static acoustic monitoring devices over the three months prior to eDNA sampling.
sequencing of PCR clones indicates these were genetic detections of long-finned pilot whale and not genetic detection of harbor porpoise at this site.