Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 29;7(8):e41781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041781

Table 1. Detection of harbor porpoise DNA using qPCR at a controlled site (Fjord&Belt pen) and at natural sites.

Acoustic detection Genetic detection
Location % Porpoise positive days Positive PCRs Cycle threshold
Positive control (DNA extracted from skin) 3/3 18, 18, 18
Fjord&Bælt pen 3/3 34, 35, 35
<10 m from F&B pen 1/3 49
>10 m from F&B pen 0/3 -
Site 1 94 1/3 49
Site 2 42 0/3 -
Site 3 63 0/3 -
Site 4 6 0/3 -
Site 5 0 0/3 -
Site 6 0 0/3 -
Site 7 0 2/3 38*, 50*
Site 8 79 0/3 -

Genetic detections at the eight natural sites are compared with acoustic detection rates based on data from static acoustic monitoring devices over the three months prior to eDNA sampling.

*

sequencing of PCR clones indicates these were genetic detections of long-finned pilot whale and not genetic detection of harbor porpoise at this site.