Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Mutat. 2012 Apr 30;33(7):1107–1115. doi: 10.1002/humu.22093

Table 3.

Summary of the effects of selected single point variations deduced from analysis of MD simulations, compared to the wild type protein (Variation Q188R was used as reference)

Variant Impact on conformation
variability
Impact on Rg Impact on secondary
structures
Impact on H-bond
pattern
Impact on
ligand binding
by Q188
apo form holo form apo form holo form apo form holo form apo form holo form holo form
H132Q YES NO YES NO YES YES A: YES
I: NO
A: YES
I: NO
L: YES
YES
V168L YES NO YES YES YES YES A: YES
I: NO
A: YES
I: YES
L: YES
NO
P185H YES YES YES NO NO YES A: YES
I: YES
A: YES
I: YES
L: YES
YES
I278N NO YES YES YES NO YES A: NO
I: YES
A: NO
I: NO
L: YES
YES
Q188R YES NO YES YES YES NO A: YES
I: NO
A: YES
I: YES
L: YES
(This variant
lacks Q188)

“YES” and “NO” indicate if the variation is able to perturb each feature represented in columns, or not. A: H-bond pattern of the whole protein; I: H-bond pattern between chain A and chain B; L: H-bond pattern between protein and ligand