Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 May 3;21(12):1251–1260. doi: 10.1002/pds.3272

Table 2.

Impact of FDA Warning on Prevalent Second Generation Antipsychotic Users, by Diagnosis

Bipolar Disorder Schizophrenia

Modeled Outcomea Risk Risk Ratio 95% Confidence
Interval
Risk Risk Ratio 95% Confidence
Interval
Second Generation Antipsychotic Use
    Pre-Advisory Period (Jan 01 – Jan 03) .66 REF REF .70 REF REF
    Early- Advisory (Feb 03 – Nov 03) .64 .96 .93–.99 .70 1.00 1.00–1.01
    Advisory Period (Dec 03 – Aug 04) .62 .94 .91–.98 .69 .99 .99–1.00
    Initial Post-Advisory (Sept 04 – Mar 05) .61 .93 .89–.97 .68 .98 .97–.99
    PDL / CATIE / Dementia Warning (April 05 – Sept 05) .61 .92 .88–.96 .67 .96 .95–.97
    Post-PDL/CATIE / Dementia Warning (Oct 05 – Dec 06) .52 .78 .74–.82 .60 .87 .85–.88

Alternative Medication Useb
    Pre-Advisory Period (Jan 01 – Jan 03) .22 1.00 REF .07 1.00 REF
    Early- Advisory (Feb 03 – Nov 03) .31 1.38 1.31–1.45 .07 1.02 .99–1.06
    Advisory Period (Dec 03 – Aug 04) .31 1.38 1.29–1.47 .07 1.02 .98–1.07
    Initial Post-Advisory (Sept 04 – Mar 05) .32 1.44 1.33–1.55 .07 1.00 .95–1.05
    PDL / CATIE / Dementia Warning (April 05 – Sept 05) .31 1.39 1.28–1.51 .07 1.00 .95–1.06
    Post-PDL/CATIE / Dementia Warning (Oct 05 – Dec 06) .30 1.33 1.22–1.46 .07 .96 .91–1.02

Second Generation Antipsychotic Discontinuationsc
    Pre-Advisory Period (Jan 01 – Jan 03) .03 1.00 REF .03 1.00 REF
    Early- Advisory (Feb 03 – Nov 03) .02 .75 .60–.94 .02 .75 .69–.82
    Advisory Period (Dec 03 – Aug 04) .02 .74 .58–.95 .02 .79 .71–.87
    Initial Post-Advisory (Sept 04 – Mar 05) .02 .73 .55–.98 .02 .80 .72–.90
    PDL / CATIE / Dementia Warning (April 05 – Sept 05) .02 .88 .66–1.18 .03 .96 .86–1.08
    Post-PDL/CATIE / Dementia Warning (Oct 05 – Dec 06) .04 1.37 1.11–1.68 .04 1.46 1.35–1.58

Second Generation Antipsychotic Interruptionsd
    Pre-Advisory Period (Jan 01 – Jan 03) .09 1.00 REF .08 1.00 REF
    Early- Advisory (Feb 03 – Nov 03) .08 .81 .74–.90 .07 .82 .80–.85
    Advisory Period (Dec 03 – Aug 04) .08 .80 .72–.89 .07 .82 .79–.85
    Initial Post-Advisory (Sept 04 – Mar 05) .08 .82 .72–.93 .07 .82 .78–.85
    PDL / CATIE / Dementia Warning (April 05 – Sept 05) .07 .80 .70–.91 .08 .90 .86–.93
    Post-PDL/CATIE / Dementia Warning (Oct 05 – Dec 06) .07 .77 .68–.86 .07 .82 .80–.85
a

Generalized estimating equations were used to account for the repeated measures on each subject. We estimated each model using PROC GENMOD (SAS, 9.1) with a Poisson distribution, log link. The correlation structure was unspecified. Control variables included sex, age, race, Medicaid eligibility status, and the presence of the following during the 6 months prior to the index prescription date: receipt of care from a psychiatrist, inpatient mental health treatment, dementia, alcohol or substance abuse, epilepsy, complicating conditions, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, heart disease, or obesity. PDL / CATIE / Dementia Warning = Period including the Medicaid Preferred-Drug List policy change, publication of the CATIE trial results, and the FDA’s black box warning for the risk of mortality among elderly patients with dementia.

b

Medication alternatives included first generation antipsychotics (for enrollees with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder), and lithium, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, or valproate (for enrollees with bipolar disorder).

c

Discontinuations were defined as 6 or more months of no second generation antipsychotic use following a month of second generation antipsychotic use.

d

Interruptions were defined as a gap in second generation antipsychotic fills of 1 to 5 months with second generationantipsychotic use before and after the gap.