Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jul;63(7):660–665. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100401

Table 2.

Outcomes of augmented, routine, and computer training of 115 community therapists

Measure Augmented training
Computer training
Routine training
Na df pb
M SD M SD M SD
Adherencec
 Baseline 1.51 1.21 1.71 1.31 1.63 1.09 114d 2, 111 .78
 Posttraining 3.36 1.22 2.71 1.36 2.93 1.51 115 2, 112 .20
Skille
 Baseline 2.67 1.22 2.94 1.30 3.02 1.13 114d 2, 111 .40
 Posttraining 3.68 1.47 3.67 1.47 4.13 1.45 115 2, 112 .09
Knowledgef
 Baseline 15.25 1.92 14.85 2.41 15.27 2.32 115 2, 112 .67
 Posttraining 16.83 1.93 17.42 1.81 17.45 1.83 115 2, 112 .26
a

For participants who dropped out of the study, their last observation was carried forward.

b

For the main effect of condition

c

Possible scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating better adherence to protocol. F=83.21, df=1 and 111, p<.001

d

Pretraining adherence and skill data were missing for one participant as a result of recording error.

e

Possible scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating higher competence. F=69.06, df=1 and 111, p<.001

f

Possible scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. F=96.74, df=1 and 112, p<.001