Table 2.
Measure | Augmented training
|
Computer training
|
Routine training
|
Na | df | pb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||||
Adherencec | |||||||||
Baseline | 1.51 | 1.21 | 1.71 | 1.31 | 1.63 | 1.09 | 114d | 2, 111 | .78 |
Posttraining | 3.36 | 1.22 | 2.71 | 1.36 | 2.93 | 1.51 | 115 | 2, 112 | .20 |
Skille | |||||||||
Baseline | 2.67 | 1.22 | 2.94 | 1.30 | 3.02 | 1.13 | 114d | 2, 111 | .40 |
Posttraining | 3.68 | 1.47 | 3.67 | 1.47 | 4.13 | 1.45 | 115 | 2, 112 | .09 |
Knowledgef | |||||||||
Baseline | 15.25 | 1.92 | 14.85 | 2.41 | 15.27 | 2.32 | 115 | 2, 112 | .67 |
Posttraining | 16.83 | 1.93 | 17.42 | 1.81 | 17.45 | 1.83 | 115 | 2, 112 | .26 |
For participants who dropped out of the study, their last observation was carried forward.
For the main effect of condition
Possible scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating better adherence to protocol. F=83.21, df=1 and 111, p<.001
Pretraining adherence and skill data were missing for one participant as a result of recording error.
Possible scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating higher competence. F=69.06, df=1 and 111, p<.001
Possible scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge. F=96.74, df=1 and 112, p<.001