Table 3.

Anatomical regions identified by AnaCOM as significantly associated with a deficit in the different Hayling scores

Hayling	Anatomical regions	BA	MNI coordinates			P values (×10−4)	Mean scores
Overall score, H < 3.90 × 10−4	Medial superior frontal/medial orbital G.	10/11	13	53	−7	1.3–3.9	2.5–2.8
	Anterior cingulate/medial superior frontal	32/11	14	42	5	0.9–3.9	1–2.6
	Inferior frontal G.	47/45	39	32	4	1.9–4.0	1–2.9
‘Initiation’’ subscore, H < 3.06 × 10−4	Medial superior frontal/medial orbital G.	10/11	12	56	−9	0.5–3.1	3–3.8
	Medial superior frontal G.	10	18	64	4	2.8	3
	Inferior frontal G.	47	34	32	4	0.5–2.7	3.4–3.8
	Anterior cingulate/medial superior frontal	32/11	17	46	3	0.6–2.8	2.2–3.3
	Temporal pole	38	42	12	−19	3.1	3.8
“Suppression” subscore, H < 8.71 × 10−4	Inferior frontal G.	47/45	39	30	3	0.4–8.7	3.4–3.5
“Suppression-errors” subscore, H < 23 × 10−4	Anterior orbital G.	11	22	47	−11	23	1

Note: All the reported regions were significant after Holm correction for multiple comparisons (H: Holm threshold) and were right-sided. These regions were composed of groups of several significant clusters—that is patterns of lesion overlaps—each cluster having its own P value. Thus, the range of the P values for the clusters forming each region is given. The last column represents mean scores of patients damaged in each significant region. (BA, Brodmann area; G, gyrus).