Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):455–468. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0086-9

Figure 5. Intrusions as a function of list learning rate.

Figure 5

TCM’s predictions regarding the probability of intruding a list B item into list A recall in the reminder condition on day 3 (delayed test), as a function of the relative learning rates for list A and list B. The A = B condition (provided for reference) is identical to the condition simulated in in Figure 1 (left panel); in this condition, the learning rate was set to 1.0 for both lists. The A < B condition used a learning rate of 0.5 for list A and a learning rate of 1.0 for list B. The A > B condition used a learning rate of 1.0 for list A and a learning rate of 0.5 for list B. For all three conditions, list A recalls are correct responses and list B recalls are intrusions.