Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Apr 22;133(19):7536–7546. doi: 10.1021/ja2014345

Table 2. Trifunctional Catalysis Screening.

graphic file with name nihms291512u1.jpg

entrya third catalyst, (equiv.) R NuH % yield
1 none CH2Ph MeOH <4
2 LiPF6-THF, (0.1) CH2Ph MeOH 21
3 LiCI04,(1) CH2Ph MeOH trace
4 LiCI04, (0.1) CH2Ph MeOH 21
5 La(OTf)3,(0.1) CH2Ph MeOH 8
6 Sm(OTf)3, (0.1) CH2Ph MeOH 5
7 Yb(OTf)3, (0.1) CH2Ph MeOH 3
8 LiCI04, (0.1)b CH2Ph MeOH trace
9 (PPh3)2Pd(CI04)2, (0.05)b Ph MeOH trace
10 none CH2Ph PhNH2 4
11 none CH2Ph PhNH2 22c
12 LiCI04, (0.1) CH2Ph PhNH2 39c
13 LiCI04, (0.1) CH2Ph PhNH2 44d
14 none i-Pr PhNH2 15
15 LiCI04, (0.1) i -Pr PhNH2 50
16 LiCI04, (0.1) i -Pr PhNH2 73c
a

Reaction conditions: 1 equiv. NFSi, 1 equiv. acid chloride, 0.1 equiv. BQd, 0.05 equiv. frans-(PPh3)2PdCI2, 1.1 equiv. Hünig's base, THF, −78 °C, followed by nucleophilic quench at −78 °C after 8 h.

b

No trans-(PPh3)2PdCI2 catalyst.

c

Slow addition of Hünig's base over 12 h.

d

Slow addition of Hünig's base over 24.