Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 21;2012:245727. doi: 10.1155/2012/245727

Table 1.

Comparison of mechanical properties for solid Ti-6Al-4V and Co-26Cr-6Mo.

Material Microstructure HV (GPa) HRC YS (GPa) UTS (GPa) Elongation (%)
Wrought Ti-6Al-4V Coarse acicular α-phase 3.8 48 1.17 1.23 12
EBM (z) Ti-6Al-4V Acicular α-phase 3.6 38 1.03 1.11 13
EBM (x,y) Ti-6Al-4V α′-martensite + α-phase 4.1 41 1.10 1.11 11
ASTM Grade 5 (nominal) Ti-6Al-4V Acicular α-phase plates 3.4 37 0.9 1.00 15
ASTM-F75 (wrought) Co-26Cr-6Mo Equiaxed grains with annealing twins 2.8 30 0.45 0.66 10
EBM (z) Co-26Cr-6Mo Columnar precipitates (Cr23C6) 4.6 48 0.51 1.45 3.6
EBM (x,y) Co-26Cr-6Mo Columnar precipitates (Cr23C6) 0.77 0.84 2.7
EBM (z) + HIP Co-26Cr-6Mo Equiaxed fcc grains with annealing twins 3.6 31 0.60 1.15 32
EBM (x,y) + HIP Co-26Cr-6Mo Equiaxed fcc grains with annealing twins 0.63 0.99 20