Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 22;2012:203141. doi: 10.1155/2012/203141

Table 2.

Summary of self-reported daily walking by older women living in Portland metropolitan area according to urban-form cluster.

Urban-form cluster Number of blocks walked per day
Mean Standard deviation Median Minimum Maximum N
Walking for utilitarian purposes

Cluster 1: central city 6.39 5.68 5 1 48 694
Cluster 2: city periphery 5.76 5.65 4 1 60 573
Cluster 3: suburb 6.67 7.13 4.5 1 48 170
Cluster 4: urban fringe with poor commercial area access 5.65 5.35 4 1 24 20
Cluster 5: urban fringe with poor park area access 6.95 7.60 4 1 36 41
Cluster 6: satellite city 5.33 4.30 5 1 15 9

Walking for leisure purposes

Cluster 1: central city 14.69 10.85 12 1 82 492
Cluster 2: city periphery 13.88 10.30 12 1 72 457
Cluster 3: suburb 14.28 10.52 12 1 48 151
Cluster 4: urban fringe with poor commercial area access 9.79 8.40 8 1 24 14
Cluster 5: urban fringe with poor park area access 11.66 8.55 10 1 36 29
Cluster 6: satellite city 15.00 10.20 13.5 5 28 6

Walking for leisure and utilitarian purposes combined, excluding those who do not walk regularly

Cluster 1: central city 14.60 13.36 11 1 102 799
Cluster 2: city periphery 13.98 12.88 10 1 96 690
Cluster 3: suburb 15.59 13.45 12 1 66 211
Cluster 4: urban fringe with poor commercial area access 10.00 9.65 5 1 30 25
Cluster 5: urban fringe with poor park area access 13.84 11.12 12 1 44 45
Cluster 6: satellite city 13.80 11.83 9.5 2 36 10

Walking for leisure and utilitarian purposes combined, including those who do not walk regularly

Cluster 1: central city 13.24 13.41 9 0 102 881
Cluster 2: city periphery 12.26 12.91 8 0 96 787
Cluster 3: suburb 13.43 13.60 9 0 66 245
Cluster 4: urban fringe with poor commercial area access 8.93 9.63 4.5 0 30 28
Cluster 5: urban fringe with poor park area access 12.22 11.37 10 0 44 51
Cluster 6: satellite city 10.62 11.90 6 0 36 13