Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Org Chem. 2012 Jul 23;77(15):6629–6633. doi: 10.1021/jo301156e

Palladium-Catalyzed Borylation of Primary Alkyl Bromides

Amruta Joshi-Pangu 1, Xinghua Ma 1, Mohamed Diane 1, Sidra Iqbal 1, Robert J Kribs 1, Richard Huang 1, Chao-Yuan Wang 1, Mark R Biscoe 1,
PMCID: PMC3432578  NIHMSID: NIHMS396144  PMID: 22774861

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms396144f2.jpg

A mild Pd-catalyzed process for the borylation of alkyl bromides has been developed using bis(pinacolato)diboron as a boron source. This process accommodates the use of a wide range of functional groups on the alkyl bromide substrate. Primary bromides react with complete selectivity in the presence of a secondary bromide. The generality of this approach is demonstrated by its extension to the use of alkyl iodides and alkyl tosylates, as well as borylation reactions employing bis(neopentyl glycolato)diboron as the boron source.


Over the past few decades, the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction has become a workhorse for the construction of carbon-carbon bonds.13 The majority of such reactions involves the use of aryl or vinylboron nucleophiles. In comparison, methods that allow the general use of alkylboron nucleophiles in Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions have remained far less developed.4,5 A major focus of the research in our laboratory is the development of new methods for carbon-carbon bond formation via metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions using alkyl nucleophiles.68 For such transformations, alkylboron reagents constitute ideal nucleophiles. The high covalency of the carbon-boron bond typically makes alkylboron reagents air and moisture stable, configurationally stable, and compatible with a diverse range of functional groups.9,10 Thus, the development of new cross-coupling methods that enable the general use of alkylboron reagents is an attractive synthetic goal.

Classically, organoboron reagents have been generated via borylation of the corresponding lithium or magnesium reagents, or via the hydroboration of a terminal olefin.11 More recently, significant progress has been made towards the development of new, milder methods to generate organoboron reagents for use in synthesis. Particular attention has been focused on the preparation of alkyl and aryl boronic ester derivatives via transition metal-catalyzed processes. Notable examples include the metal-catalyzed hydroboration of alkenes,1216 metal-catalyzed C-H activation/borylation sequences,1725 and metal-catalyzed β-borylation of α,β-unsaturated compounds.2630 With the aim of developing a mild and general method to generate primary alkylboronate esters for use in cross-coupling reactions, we explored the possiblity of using bis(pinacolato)diboron as a boron source in the Pd-catalyzed borylation of alkyl halides. An analogous strategy has been successfully applied to the formation of arylboronic esters from aryl halides.3133 However, a method to effect the direct Pd-catalyzed borylation of alkyl halides has not been reported.3436 Herein, we report a Pd-catalyzed method for the selective borylation of primary alkyl bromides. This process displays excellent functional group tolerance and can be extended to the use of alkyl iodides and alkyl tosylates. Additionally, we have demonstrated that bis(neopentyl glycolato)diboron can be successfully employed as the boron source with nominal variation of the standard reaction conditions.

Initial ligand screening revealed that trialkylphosphines were most effective in the Pd-catalyzed borylation of (3-bromopropyl)benzene. This is consistent with the reported ability of trialkylphosphine-ligated palladium(0) complexes to undergo oxidative addition into primary alkyl halides.3739 Products resulting from alkyl halide reduction and β-hydride elimination constituted the major side-products observed during reaction optimization. There was no evidence for protodeboronation of the alkylboronic esters products over the course of the reactions. Our final, optimized conditions are displayed in Table 1. The use of t-Bu2MeP•HBF4 as a supporting ligand resulted in the highest yields. t-BuOH and DMA were the most effective solvents for this transformation. K3PO4 was the most effective base, though K2CO3 could also be used successfully. While the addition of exogenous water was found to be essential for efficient conversion, only a nominal variation in GC yield was observed when 3 equiv H2O was used in place of 15 equiv H2O.

Table 1.

Optimization of Standard Reaction Conditions

graphic file with name nihms396144t1.jpg

Entry Variation from standard conditions above Yield (%)a
1 None 97
2 3 equiv H2O 93
3 NMP used as solvent, 3 equiv H2O 29
4 Toluene used as solvent, 3 equiv H2O <10
5 DMA used as solvent, 3 equiv H2O 70
6 DMF used as solvent, 3 equiv H2O 44
7 DMF used as solvent, no water <10
8 PCy3▪•HBF4 used as ligand, 3 equiv H2O 34
9 Pn-Bu3•HBF4 used as ligand, 3 equiv H2O <10
10 Pt-Bu3•HBF used as ligand, 3 equiv H2O <10
a

Yields and selectivities determined by GC with dodecane as an internal standard.

Using the optimized conditions displayed in Table 1, alkylboronate esters were generated cleanly in high yields from a wide range of functionalized primary alkyl bromides (Table 2). Alkyl bromide substrates bearing functional groups including nitriles, alcohols, ethers, esters, amides, and imides were successfully borylated.40 The presence of heterocyclic substituents on the alkyl bromide substrate was also well tolerated. 1-Bromo-5-chloropentane underwent selective borylation at the bromide. Although primary alkyl chlorides did not undergo efficient borylation under these conditions, alkyl iodides and alkyl tosylates were viable electrophiles. As these reactions proceeded, we observed no evidence of transmetallation of the pinacol alkylboronate ester produced in the reaction.

Table 2.

Pd-Catalyzed Borylation of Primary Alkyl Bromidesa

graphic file with name nihms396144t2.jpg
a

Alkyl bromide (1 mmol), bis(pinacolato)diboron (1.2 mmol); average yield of 2 runs.

b

Using alkyl iodide.

c

Ussing alkyl tosylate.

d

0.75 mmol scale.

e

3 mol % PCy3•HBF4.

f

1.5 mol % Pd2(dba)3, 9 mol % PCy3•HBF4.

In contrast to nickel- and copper-catalyzed processes which can undergo oxidative addition via radical processes,35,36,41,42 Pd(0) complexes generally undergo oxidative addition with alkyl halides via direct nucleophilic displacement of the halide leaving group.3739 As a result, the use of Pd catalysis is generally limited to primary electrophiles. Fortunately, this mechanism for oxidative addition can be exploited to achieve the chemoselective borylation of molecules bearing multiple halide groups. Using 1,4-dibromopentane (4) as an electrophile (Scheme 1), we observed that a primary bromide could indeed be selectively borylated in the presence of a remote secondary bromide. This reaction occurred efficiently, with no detectable trace of borylation at the secondary bromide.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Selective Borylation of Primary Bromidea

a Alkyl bromide (1 mmol), bis(pinacolato)diboron (1.2 mmol); average yield of 2 runs.

To broaden the utility of our borylation method, we have developed methods to convert the crude pinacol boronate products to other boronate derivatives (Table 3). After borylation of (3-bromopropyl)benzene via the standard conditions of Table 1, transformation of the resulting pinacol boronate ester to a trifluoroboronate (6a), boronic acid (6b), and propylene glycol boronate (6c) was readily achieved without isolation of the pinacol boronate intermediate.

Table 3.

Direct Preparation of Boronate Ester Derivativesa

graphic file with name nihms396144t3.jpg
a

Alkyl bromide (0.75 mmol); average yield of 2 runs.

b

KHF2, MeOH, rt, 2 h.

c

NaIO4, HCl(aq), THF/H2O, rt, 3 h.

d

footnote c, then 1,3-propanediol, benzene, reflux, 12 h.

It has been demonstrated that transmetallation of an aryl group from a pinacol boronate ester to palladium occurs significantly more slowly than transmetallation of an aryl group from a neopentyl glycol boronate ester.43 Consistent with this trend, Pd-catalyzed borylation reactions that form pinacol alkylboronate esters showed no sign of post-borylation transmetallation of the alkyl group, while neopentyl glycol alkylboronate esters generated by an analogous process displayed evidence of subsequent transmetallation of the alkyl group. However, with minor modifications, we successfully developed a process to achieve the Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of alkyl bromides and bis(neopenyl glycolato)diboron (7) with minimal transmetallation of the generated alkylboronate ester (8) (Table 4). Although yields for the reactions were lower than those for the formation of the corresponding pinacol alkylboronate esters, the general success of this reaction underscores the broad utility of our process, and suggests that alkyl boronate compounds may be successfully formed from the Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction of alkyl electrophiles with other diboron reagents.

Table 4.

Pd-Catalyzed Borylation of Alkyl Bromides Using Bis(neopentyl glycolato)diborona

graphic file with name nihms396144t4.jpg
a

Alkyl bromide (0.2 mmol), bis(pinacolato)diboron (0.22 mmol); average yield of 2 runs.

In conclusion, we have developed a mild process for the Pd-catalyzed borylation of primary alkyl electrophiles using bis(pinacolato)diboron as a boron source. The reaction is highly tolerant of reactive functional groups, requires low catalyst loadings, and accommodates the use of alkyl bromide, iodide, and tosylate electrophiles. Primary bromides react with complete selectivity over secondary bromides. The ability to easily convert the pinacol alkylboronate esters directly into boronic acids, trifluoroboronates, and other boronate esters broadens the utility of this method. Finally, we have demonstrated that our borylation process is not exclusive to the use of bis(pinacolato)diboron as a boron source, and can be extended to the use of other diboron reagents.

Experimental Section

Toluene and THF (unstabilized) were transferred to separate 20 L solvent-delivery kegs and vigorously purged with argon for 2 h. The solvents were further purified by passing them under argon pressure through two packed columns of neutral alumina (for THF) or through neutral alumina and copper (II) oxide (for toluene). All other reagents and solvents were used as received unless otherwise noted. Flash chromatography was performed using silica gel (ultra pure grade). Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were recorded on a 500 MHz instrument. All 1H NMR experiments are reported in δ units, parts per million (ppm), and were measured relative to the signals for residual chloroform (7.26 ppm), dimethyl sulfoxide (2.50 ppm) or acetonitrile (1.94 ppm). All 13C NMR spectra are reported in ppm relative to deuterochloroform (77.2 ppm), dimethyl sulfoxide (39.5 ppm) or acetonitrile (118.3 ppm) and were obtained with 1H decoupling. All GC analyses were performed on a gas chromatograph with an FID detector using a 25 m × 0.20 mm capillary column with cross-linked methyl siloxane as the stationary phase.

General procedure for borylation of primary alkyl bromides with bis(pinacolato)diboron

Pd2(dba)3 (4.6 mg, 0.005 mmol), di-tert-butyl(methyl)phosphonium tetrafluoroborate (7.4 mg, 0.03 mmol), (BPin)2 (305 mg, 1.2 mmol) and K3PO4•H2O (460 mg, 2 mmol) were weighed out on the benchtop in an oven-dried 10 mL screw top test tube with stir bar. The test tube was sealed using a screw cap lined with a teflon septum. With stirring begun, the test tube was evacuated (100 mTorr), and backfilled three times with argon using a needle attached to a vacuum manifold. The alkyl bromide (1 mmol) was then added to the test tube via a microsyringe, followed by degassed tertiary butyl alcohol (3 mL) and degassed water (0.25 mL). If the alkyl bromide was a solid, it was weighed out after K3PO4•H2O before evacuating the test tube. The test tube was sealed with electrical tape and the reaction mixture was stirred overnight on the benchtop at 60 °C with no additional argon pressure. N.B.: Ensure that K3PO4•H2O does not clump while the reaction is in progress. If clumping becomes problematic, K2CO3 may be used in place of K3PO4•H2O. The reaction mixture was quenched through the addition of saturated aqueous NH4Cl (5 mL). The resulting mixture was then poured into a separatory funnel and extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.

General procedure for borylation of primary alkyl bromides with bis(neopentylglycolato) diboron

Pd2(dba)3 (1.83 mg, 0.002 mmol), di-tert-butyl(methyl)phosphonium tetrafluoroborate (3 mg, 0.012 mmol), (BNeop)2 (54 mg, 0.24 mmol) and anhydrous K3PO4 (85 mg, 0.4 mmol) were weighed out in the glove-box in an oven-dried 10 mL screw top test tube with stir bar. The test tube was sealed using a screw cap lined with a teflon septum. The reaction was stirred on a stir plate and alkyl bromide (0.2 mmol) was then added to the vial via a microsyringe. Degassed tertiary butyl alcohol (1mL) and degassed water (20 µL) were then added under argon, outside of the glove box. The test tube was sealed with an electrical tape and the reaction mixture was stirred for 5 hours on the benchtop at 80 °C with no additional argon pressure. The reaction mixture was quenched through the addition of saturated aqueous NH4Cl (ca. 4 mL). The resulting mixture was then poured into a separatory funnel and extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4. The crude product was purified by column chromatography.

4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-2-(3-phenylpropyl)-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (3a).44

The general procedure was employed. A reddish yellow liquid (236 mg, 96%) was isolated by column chromatography (98:2 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.27 (t, J= 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.16–7.20 (m, 3H), 2.63 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.76 (app. quint., J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.26 (s, 12H), 0.85 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 142.8, 128.6, 128.3, 125.7, 83.0, 38.69, 26.2, 24.9, 11 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 33.3 ppm.

2-Isopentyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (3b).45

The general procedure was employed. A yellow liquid (147 mg, 74%) was isolated by column chromatography (99:1 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.45 (m, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.21–1.3 (m, 2H), 1.23 (s, 12H), 0.84 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 6H), 0.74 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 83.0, 33.1, 30.4, 25.0, 22.4 ppm. The carbon atom directly attached to the boron atom was not detected, likely due to quadrupolar broadening. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 33.3 ppm.

6-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hexan-1-ol (3c).35

The general procedure was employed. A brownish liquid (139 mg, 61%) was isolated by column chromatography (gradient from 80:20 to 75:25 Hex:EtOAc). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.63 (app. q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.53–1.59 (m, 2H), 1.38–1.45 (m, 2H), 1.29–1.36 (m, 4H), 1.24 (s, 12H), 0.77 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 83.0, 63.2, 32.8, 32.2, 25.6, 24.9, 24.0 ppm. The carbon atom directly attached to the boron atom was not detected, likely due to quadrupolar broadening. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 33.2 ppm.

4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-2-(2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl)-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (3d).35

The general procedure was employed. An orange-yellow liquid (149 mg, 63%) was isolated by column chromatography (98:2 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.08 (dd, J = 5 Hz, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (m, 1H), 6.79 (m, 1H), 2.96 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.24 (m, 14H), ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 147.9, 126.6, 123.5, 122.7, 83.3, 24.9, 24.5 ppm. The carbon atom directly attached to the boron atom was not detected, likely due to quadrupolar broadening. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 32.9 ppm.

6-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hexanenitrile (3e).35

The general procedure was employed. A golden yellow liquid (214 mg, 96%) was isolated by column chromatography (gradient from 95:5 to 93:7 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 2.30 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 1.63 (quint., J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.40–1.43 (m, 4H), 1.22 (s, 12H), 0.76 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 119.9, 83.1, 31.3, 25.2, 24.9, 23.2, 17.1, 11 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 33.1 ppm.

Ethyl 4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)butanoate (3f)

The general procedure was employed with following modification: The ligand used in this reaction is tricyclohexylphosphonium tetrafluoroborate (11 mg, 0.03 mmol). A bright yellow liquid (215 mg, 89%) was isolated by column chromatography (95:5 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 4.10 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 2.31 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.74 (app. quint., J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.23–1.26 (m, 15H), 0.81 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 173.8, 83.1, 60.2, 36.7, 24.8, 19.8, 14.4, 11 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 32.8 ppm. HRMS (EI+): Calcd (C12H23BO4 +) 242.1689; Found 242.1700.

2-(2-Cyclohexylethyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (3g).46

The general procedure was employed with following modifications: Pd2(dba)3 (14 mg, 0.015 mmol), tricyclohexylphosphonium tetrafluoroborate ligand (33 mg, 0.09 mmol). A pale yellow liquid (198 mg, 83%) was isolated by column chromatography (98:2 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.61–1.72 (m, 5H), 1.11–1.31 (m, 18H), 0.83 (app. q, J = 12 Hz, 2H), 0.75 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 83.0, 40.1, 33.1, 31.5, 26.9, 26.6, 24.9, 20 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 33.4 ppm.

2-(5-Chloropentyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (3h).47

The general procedure was employed with following modification: The ligand used in this reaction is tricyclohexylphosphonium tetrafluoroborate (11 mg, 0.03 mmol). A yellowish orange liquid (211 mg, 91%) was isolated by column chromatography (98:2 Hex:Ether) 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.50 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 1.75 (app. quint., J = 7 Hz, 2H), 1.41 (m, 4H), 1.23 (s, 12H), 0.77 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 83.1, 45.2, 32.6, 29.6, 24.9, 23.4, 11 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 32.9 ppm.

10-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)decanamide (3i)

The general procedure was employed. A white solid (279 mg, 94%) was isolated by column chromatography (95:5 CH2Cl2:MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 5.32 (broad d, 2H), 2.21 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.60–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.22–1.26 (m, 22H), 0.76 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 175.6, 83.0, 36.1, 32.6, 29.62, 29.50, 29.46, 29.38, 25.7, 25.0, 24.1 ppm. The carbon atom directly attached to the boron atom was not detected, likely due to quadrupolar broadening. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 33.7 ppm. Anal. Calcd. for C16H32BNO3: C, 64.65; H, 10.85. Found: C, 64.41; H, 10.99.

4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-2-(4-phenoxybutyl)-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (3j).48

The general procedure was employed. A bright yellow liquid (259 mg, 94%) was isolated by column chromatography (99:1 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.26 (dt, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 Hz, 2H), 6.88–6.93 (m, 3H), 3.95 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.80 (quint., J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.59 (quint., J = 8Hz, 2H), 1.25 (s, 12H), 0.86 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 159.3, 129.5, 120.5, 114.6, 83.1, 67.8, 31.9, 25.0, 20.7 ppm. The carbon atom directly attached to the boron atom was not detected, likely due to quadrupolar broadening. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 33.1 ppm.

2-(4-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)butyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (3k)

The general procedure was employed with following modification: tricyclohexylphosphonium tetrafluoroborate (11 mg, 0.03 mmol) was used as ligand. A brown liquid (260 mg, 79%) was isolated by column chromatography (gradient from 85:15 to 80:20 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.80 (dd, J = 8.5 Hz, 3 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (dt, J = 8.5 Hz, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 3.64 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.66 (quint., J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.44 (quint., J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.20 (s, 12H), 0.79 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 168.5, 133.9, 132.3, 123.2, 83.1, 38.0, 31.2, 24.9, 21.4, 11 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (MHz, CDCl3) δ: 33.0 ppm. Anal. Calcd. for C18H24BNO4: C, 65.67; H, 7.35. Found: C, 65.45; H, 7.28.

2-(4-Bromopentyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (5)

The general procedure was employed. A bright yellow liquid (219 mg, 79%) was isolated by column chromatography (98:2 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 4.13 (app. sextet, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.82–1.90 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.80 (m, 1H), 1.70 (d, J = 7 Hz, 3H), 1.48–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.24 (s, 12H), 0.73–0.84 (m, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 83.1, 51.6, 43.8, 26.5, 24.9, 22.3, 10 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (160 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 33.2 ppm. HRMS (EI+): Calcd (C11H22BBrO2 – CH3+) 261.0661; Found 261.0656.

Potassium 3-phenyl-trifluoroboratopropane (6a).35

The general procedure was employed. A white solid (118mg, 70 %) 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ: 7.20–7.23 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H), 7.08– 7.12 (m, 3H), 2.45 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.40 (app. quint., J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 0.02 (m, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO) δ: 144.1, 128.3, 127.9, 124.9, 28.25, 28.24, 20 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (160 MHz, DMSO) δ: 9.3 ppm.

3-Phenylpropylboronic acid (6b).49

The general procedure was employed. A yellowish white solid (109 mg, 89 %) 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ: 7.40 (s, 2H), 7.25 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.13–7.16 (m, 3H), 2.50 (m, 2H), 1.60 (app. quint., J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 0.60 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3CN) δ: 143.9, 129.4, 129.1, 126.5, 39.2, 27.3 ppm. The carbon atom directly attached to the boron atom was not detected, likely due to quadrupolar broadening. 11B (160 MHz, CD3CN) δ: 37.0 ppm.

2-(3-Phenylpropyl)-1,3,2-dioxaborinane (6c).50

The general procedure was employed. (92 mg, 60%) 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN) δ: 7.24–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.13–7.18 (m, 3H), 3.95 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 4H), 2.58 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.90 (quint., J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 1.68 (quint., J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 0.73 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3CN) δ: 143.1, 128.7, 128.2, 125.6, 61.7, 38.7, 27.5, 26.1, 11 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (160 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 29.9 ppm.

5,5-Dimethyl-2-(3-phenylpropyl)-1,3,2-dioxaborinane (8a)

The general procedure was employed. A yellowish liquid (32 mg, 70%) was isolated by column chromatography (90:10 Hex: Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN) δ: 7.24–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.14–7.19 (m, 3H), 3.57 (s, 4H), 2.60 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 1.70 (app. quint., J = 8 Hz, 2H), 0.95 (s, 6H), 0.76 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3CN) δ: 143.1, 128.7, 128.3, 125.6, 72.1, 38.9, 31.8, 29.9, 26.3, 22.0, 15 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (160 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 29.7 ppm. Anal. Calcd. for C14H21BO2: C, 72.44; H, 9.12. Found: C, 72.45; H, 9.23.

Ethyl 4-(5,5-dimethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborinan-2-yl)butanoate (8b)

The general procedure was employed. A yellow liquid (28 mg, 62%) was isolated by column chromatography (90:10 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN) δ: 4.11 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 3.58 (s, 4H), 2.29 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.70 (app. quint., J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.25 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H), 0.95 (s, 6H), 0.75 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3CN) δ: 174.1, 72.1, 60.2, 36.9, 31.8, 29.8, 22.0, 19.9, 14.4, 14 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (160 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 29.4 ppm. HRMS (FAB+): Calcd (for C11H21BO4 + H+) 229.1611; Found 229.1622.

6-(5,5-Dimethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborinan-2-yl)hexanenitrile (8c)

The general procedure was employed. A yellow liquid (18 mg, 42%) was isolated by column chromatography (90:10 Hex:Ether). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.59 (s, 4H), 2.32 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.65 (app. quint., J = 7 Hz, 2H), 1.37–1.47 (m, 4H), 0.95 (s, 6H), 0.72 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 120.1, 72.1, 31.8, 31.4, 29.8, 25.4, 23.3, 22.0, 17.2, 14 (B-CH2, br) ppm. 11B (160 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 29.4 ppm. HRMS (FAB+) Calcd (for C11H20BNO2 + H+) 210.1665; Found 210.1660.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgment

We thank The National Institutes of Health (1SCGM096932-01), The City College of New York (CCNY), The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, and PSC-CUNY for financial support. We gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for an instrumentation grant (CHE-0840498). Acknowledgement is additionally made to the donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (50307-DNI1) for partial support of this research. Finally, we thank BASF for their generous gift of (BPin)2.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: 1H, 13C, and 11B NMR spectra for all products. This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References and Footnotes

  • 1.de Meijere A, Diederich F, editors. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. New York: Wiley-VCH; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Molander GA, Ellis N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007;40:275. doi: 10.1021/ar050199q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Martin R, Buchwald SL. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008;41:1461. doi: 10.1021/ar800036s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chemler SR, Trauner D, Danishefsky SJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:4544. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011217)40:24<4544::aid-anie4544>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jana R, Pathak TP, Sigman MS. Chem Rev. 2011;111:1417. doi: 10.1021/cr100327p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Joshi-Pangu A, Ganesh M, Biscoe MR. Org. Lett. 2011;13:1218. doi: 10.1021/ol200098d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Joshi-Pangu A, Wang C-Y, Biscoe MR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:8478. doi: 10.1021/ja202769t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Joshi-Pangu A, Biscoe MR. Synlett. 2012;23:1103. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1290765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Boudier A, Bromm LO, Lotz M, Knochel P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000;39:4414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crudden CM, Glasspoole BW, Lata CJ. Chem. Commun. 2009:6704. doi: 10.1039/b911537d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hall DG. Structures, Properties, and Preparation of Boronic Acid Derivatives. In: Hall DG, editor. Boronic Acids: Preparation and Applications in Organic Synthesis and Medicine. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim; 2005. pp. 1–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burgess K, Ohlmeyer MJ. Chem. Rev. 1991;91:1179. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Evans DA, Fu GC, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:6671. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Burgess K, van der Donk WA, Westcott SA, Marder TB, Baker RT, Calabrese JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:9350. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beletskaya I, Pelter A. Tetrahedron. 1997;53:4957. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Edwards DR, Crudden CM, Yam K. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005;347:50. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen HY, Schlecht S, Semple TC, Hartwig JF. Science. 2000;287:1995. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shimada S, Batsanov AS, Howard JAK, Marder TB. Angew. Chem. 2001;113:2226. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2168::AID-ANIE2168>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cho J-Y, Tse MK, Holmes D, Maleczka RE, Jr, Smith MR., III Science. 2002;295:305. doi: 10.1126/science.1067074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mkhalid IAI, Barnard JH, Marder TB, Baker RT, Calabrese JC. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:890. doi: 10.1021/cr900206p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yamamoto T, Morita T, Takagi J, Yamakawa T. Org. Lett. 2011;13:5766. doi: 10.1021/ol202267t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hartwig JF. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012;6:864. doi: 10.1021/ar200206a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ros A, Lopez-Rodriguez R, Estepa B, Alvarez E, Fernandez R, Lassaletta JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:4573. doi: 10.1021/ja300308c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yu J-Q, Dai H-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:134. doi: 10.1021/ja2097095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xiao B, Li Y-M, Liu Z-J, Yang H-Y, Fu Y. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:4854. doi: 10.1039/c2cc31737k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.O’Brien M, Lee K-S, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:10630. doi: 10.1021/ja104777u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schiffner JA, Muthner K, Oestreich M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010;49:1194. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sasaki Y, Zhong C, Sawamura H, Ito H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:1226. doi: 10.1021/ja909640b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Molander GA, McKee SA. Org. Lett. 2011;13:4684. doi: 10.1021/ol201900d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thorpe SB, Calderone JA, Santos W. Org. Lett. 2012;14:1918. doi: 10.1021/ol300575d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ishiyama T, Itoh Y, Kitano T, Miyaura N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:3447. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Furstner A, Seidel G. Org. Lett. 2002;4:541. doi: 10.1021/ol0171463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Billingsley KL, Barder TE, Buchwald SL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:5359. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.While the work contained in this manuscript was in progress, processes for the Cu-catalyzed borylation of alkyl electrophiles were reported. See references 3940.
  • 35.Yang C-T, Zhang Z-Q, Tajuddin H, Wu C-C, Liang J, Liu J-H, Fu Y, Czyzewska M, Steel PG, Marder TB, Liu L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:528. doi: 10.1002/anie.201106299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ito H, Kubota K. Org. Lett. 2012;14:890. doi: 10.1021/ol203413w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Netherton MR, Dai C, Neuschütz K, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:10099. doi: 10.1021/ja011306o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Netherton MR, Fu GC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002;41:3910. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20021018)41:20<3910::AID-ANIE3910>3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hills ID, Netherton MR, Fu GC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:5749. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.When substrates bearing remote alkenes and alkynes were employed, significant background diborylation of the alkene or alkyne was observed. See: Bonet A, Pubill-Ulldemolins C, Bo C, Gulyás H, Fernández E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:7158. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101941.
  • 41.Gonzalez-Bobes F, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:5360. doi: 10.1021/ja0613761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rudolph A, Lautens M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:2656. doi: 10.1002/anie.200803611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Carrow BP, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:2116. doi: 10.1021/ja1108326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lata CJ, Crudden CM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:131. doi: 10.1021/ja904142m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen H, Hartwig JF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999;38:3391. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19991115)38:22<3391::aid-anie3391>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Guennouni N, Lhermitte F, Cochard S, Carboni B. Tetrahedron. 1995;51:6999. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pereira S, Srebnik M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:909. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Biedrzycki M, Scouten WH, Biedrzycka Z. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992;431:255. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Falck JR, Bondlela M, Venkataraman SK, Srinivas D. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:7148–7150. doi: 10.1021/jo015838z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pei W, Krauss IJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:18514. doi: 10.1021/ja2048682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES