Table 3.
Logistic regressions predicting willingness to use condoms
| OR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI)a | |
|---|---|---|
| Condom Expectancies | ||
| Negative Condom Belief Scale (6-point scale) | 0.79 (0.7, 0.9)*** | 0.67 (0.6, 0.8)*** |
| Perceived anonymity of condom acquisition | ||
| Some or Complete | 4.25 (2.4, 7.4)*** | 4.36 (2.2, 8.6)*** |
| None | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
| Risk Perception | ||
| Nonmarital partners | ||
| Last year | 1.05 (0.9, 1.3) | ns |
| Lifetime | 1.00 (1.0, 1.0) | ns |
| Condom Self-efficacy | ||
| Ability to apply condoms | ||
| Agree | 6.57 (3.7, 11.7)*** | 4.24 (2.0, 8.9)*** |
| Disagree | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
| HIV Knowledge | ||
| HIV Transmission Scale (14-item scale) | 0.97 (0.9, 1.1) | ns |
| A healthy person can have HIV | ||
| Agree | 0.92 (0.5, 1.7) | ns |
| Disagree | 1.00 (ref) | |
| There is treatment for HIV | ||
| Agree | 0.56 (0.4, 0.9)* | ns |
| Disagree | 1.00 (ref) | |
a
Model adjusted for significant demographic variables.
*
p<.05,
***
p<.001
ns: not significant, dropped from multivariate model.