Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 31;259(9):1814–1823. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6414-9

Table 4.

Comparison of patients enrolled in observational studies and the AFFIRM trial

Reference Country/no. centers No. patients Duration of treatment Mean ARR in year prior to treatment Mean baseline EDSS
Putzki et al. [8] Germany and Switzerland/5 97 (six previously untreated) ≥12 months 2.3 3.4
Oturia et al. [9] Denmark/2 234 (175 after switching from DMT, 45 switching from mitoxantrone, 14 treatment naïve) Median 11.3 months (range 3–21.5 months) 2.53 4.0a
Sangalli et al. [10] Italy/3 285 (233 after switching treatment, 52 treatment naïve) Up to 2 years 2.13 Not reported
Outteryck et al. [12] France/not statedb 384 (5.6% treatment naïve; efficacy data for 127) ≥12 months 2.19 3.53
Prosperini et al. [11] Italy/1 190 (efficacy data for 169) Median 15 (range 1–29 months) 2.0 3.4a
Mancardi et al. [15] Italy/164 2,971
Putzki et al. [16] Switzerland/3 85 (after failure of DMT) Median 17.2 (range 12–31.4 months) 2.0 3.1
Piehl et al. [17] Sweden/36 1,115 Mean 22 months 3.86c
Fernández et al. [18] Spain/1 77 Mean 14.7 months 0.96 3.18
Horga et al. [19] Spain 112 Mean 15.8 months 2.25 4.0
Fernández et al.d Spain/86 1,415 Median 16 (range 1–50) 2.23 3.23
AFFIRM/Polman et al. [4] Multinational/99 627 (natalizumab) 2 years 1.53 (natalizumab) 2.53
315 (placebo) 1.50 (placebo)

ARR annualized relapse rate, DMT disease-modifying therapy, EDSS Expanded Disability Status Scale

aMedian

bData reported for two regions

cFor the 363 patients who completed 24 months of treatment

dThis study