Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 4.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2011 Nov 28;25(18):2279–2287. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834d614c

Table 3. Factors associated with a) switching to second-line therapy (n=437) and b) first treatment interruption with undetectable viral load (n=429*).

Factor** a) Switch to second-line b) Treatment interruption with
undetectable viral load
Rate per 100
pyar (events/pyar)***
Adjusted hazard
ratio (95% CI)
p value Rate per 100
pyar (events/pyar)***
Adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) p value
Type of initial ART
 3-drug NNRTI-based 3.9 (18/464) 1.00 3.6 (15/419) 1.00
 4-drug NNRTI-based 2.1 (5/236) 0.41 (0.15-1.14) 0.5 (1/217) 0.18 (0.02-1.50)
 Boosted PI + 2 NRTIs 1.3 (2/154) 0.26 (0.06-1.19) 2.9 (4/137) 0.67 (0.19-2.39)
 Unboosted PI + 2/3 NRTIs 5.4 (45/837) 1.41 (0.78-2.53) 1.4 (11/765) 0.53 (0.22-1.25)
 PI + NNRTI + NRTI / 3 NRTIs 3.7 (7/187) 0.99 (0.40-2.45) 0.033 2.1 (36/1697) 0.73 (0.24-2.23) 0.40
Viral suppression
 Before viral load <400c/mL 1.9 (27/1398) 1.00 **** ****
 After initial viral load <400c/mL 10.4 (50/481) 0.23 (0.15-0.37) <0.001
Viral rebound *****
 Before confirmed rebound 5.7 (22/386) 1.00 2.2 (6/267) 1.00
 After initial confirmed rebound 0.4 (4/1012) 22.80 (5.47-
95.14)
<0.001 3.0 (29/978) 0.48 (0.19-1.19) 0.11

CI, confidence interval; ART, antiretroviral therapy; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI, protease inhibitor; pyar, person-years

*

Analyses exclude 8 children enrolled in the PENTA 11 treatment interruption trial.

**

Results are only presented for factors with p value <0.1 associated separately with either switching and/or treatment interruption.

***

Rates are conditional on a child being alive and still in study follow-up, and the rate of treatment interruption with undetectable viral load further conditional on having not had a treatment interruption with detectable viral load

****

Since the outcome is treatment interruption with viral load <400c/mL, the effect of viral load <400c/m cannot be assessed.

*****

Based on 319 children for analysis of switching to second-line therapy and 329 children for analysis of treatment interruption who had a viral load <400c/mL before experiencing the outcome of interest. Follow-up time was considered from the date of initial viral load <400c/mL.