Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 14;9:56. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-56

Table 2.

comparison of single-slice image areas at baseline, after and change

Level (cm)
VAT
SAT
  Baseline (cm2) After (cm2) Δ (cm2) Baseline (cm2) After (cm2) Δ (cm2)
20
95 ± 47
65 ± 40
−30 ± 37*
138 ± 63
126 ± 65
−12 ± 19*
19
123 ± 61
82 ± 54
−41 ± 47*
136 ± 62
123 ± 62
−14 ± 20*
18
144 ± 65
101 ± 63
−43 ± 52*
136 ± 62
121 ± 62
−16 ± 20*
17
160 ± 59
116 ± 71
−44 ± 57*
136 ± 62
118 ± 60
−18 ± 20*
16
175 ± 56
132 ± 75
−43 ± 52*
137 ± 64
117 ± 59
−20 ± 21*
15
197 ± 58
150 ± 77
−48 ± 48*
140 ± 66
118 ± 59
−22 ± 22*
14
222 ± 58
168 ± 77
−54 ± 51*
144 ± 67
119 ± 59
−24 ± 22*
13
233 ± 53
181 ± 79
−52 ± 48*
148 ± 69
122 ± 60
−27 ± 23*
12
241 ± 55
189 ± 82
−52 ± 50*
156 ± 71
127 ± 62
−29 ± 24*
11
243 ± 58
194 ± 82
−49 ± 47*
163 ± 73
133 ± 65
−29 ± 25*
10
255 ± 71
201 ± 88
−54 ± 43*
176 ± 75
142 ± 68
−34 ± 26*
9
258 ± 69
197 ± 86
−61 ± 43*
187 ± 76
151 ± 70
−36 ± 26*
8
250 ± 68
185 ± 82
−64 ± 36*
194 ± 75
159 ± 74
−35 ± 26*
7
241 ± 74
186 ± 85
−55 ± 38*
202 ± 75
168 ± 78
−33 ± 26*
6
241 ± 74
184 ± 91
−57 ± 37*
210 ± 77
176 ± 82
−34 ± 28*
5
240 ± 73
182 ± 89
−58 ± 39*
220 ± 78
183 ± 84
−37 ± 30*
4
234 ± 69
179 ± 86
−55 ± 43*
229 ± 79
190 ± 87
−40 ± 31*
3
227 ± 67
172 ± 81
−54 ± 43*
236 ± 81
195 ± 89
−41 ± 31*
2
215 ± 63
165 ± 70
−50 ± 37*
243 ± 86
202 ± 90
−41 ± 33*
1
205 ± 63
156 ± 67
−48 ± 36*
254 ± 93
209 ± 91
−45 ± 30*
0
193 ± 56
148 ± 63
−44 ± 38*
266 ± 98
217 ± 91
−50 ± 34*
−1
174 ± 55
129 ± 51
−45 ± 39*
277 ± 106
220 ± 91
−57 ± 43*
−2
154 ± 52
111 ± 47
−42 ± 43*
286 ± 114
221 ± 91
−65 ± 57*
−3 141 ± 45 106 ± 41 −35 ± 37* 283 ± 115 221 ± 89 −62 ± 55*

∆ = After - Baseline.

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

* Significant change within group by paired t-test (P < 0.05).