Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2012 Aug;82(4):445–453. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.169

Table 3.

Application of CKiD prediction equations to 1/3 validation set of 322 person-visits of the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) study with iGFR 44.4 ± 17.2 ml/min per 1.73m2

Model eGFR Bias 95% LOA Correlation % of eGFR within 30% of iGFR % of eGFR within 10% of iGFR
Univariate
I: ht/SCr 43.4 ± 13.5 -1.0 -19.2, 17.1 0.84 80.4% 36.0%
II: Cystatin C 44.7 ± 15.2 0.3 -17.5, 18.1 0.85 82.6% 37.6%
III: BUN 43.0 ± 11.5 -1.4 -25.3, 22.5 0.71 65.5% 27.3%
Bivariate
I & II 44.1 ± 14.6 -0.3 -15.4, 14.7 0.90 88.8% 38.2%
I & III 43.4 ± 13.7 -1.0 -17.5, 15.5 0.87 83.9% 35.1%
II & III 44.6 ± 15.3 0.1 -16.7, 17.0 0.87 82.3% 35.4%
Multivariate:
I&II&III 44.1 ± 14.7 -0.4 -14.9, 14.2 0.90 89.1% 41.9%
Final 44.2 ± 14.9 -0.2 -13.4, 13.0 0.92 91.0% 45.0%

eGFR (ml/min per 1.73m2); LOA, Limits of Agreement.

bias = average of 322 (eGFR – iGFR) values, in ml/min per 1.73 m2

95% LOA = bias ± 1.96 ·standard deviation of (eGFR – iGFR)