Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2012 Aug;82(4):445–453. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.169

Table 4.

Application of univariate cystatin C prediction equations to 1/3 validation set of 322 person-visits of the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) study with iGFR 44.4 ± 17.2 ml/min per 1.73m2.

Equation eGFR Bias 95% LOA Correlation % of eGFR within 30% of iGFR % of eGFR within 10% of iGFR
CKiDa 44.7 ± 15.2 0.3 -17.5, 18.1 0.85 82.6% 37.6%
Zappitelli et al.b 43.5 ± 18.7 -1.0 -20.5, 18.6 0.85 77.3% 37.6%
Filler et al.c 53.5 ± 21.9 9.0 -14.0, 32.0 0.85 64.3% 21.7%
Hoek et al.d 45.0 ± 18.0 0.6 -18.4, 19.6 0.85 78.6% 37.9%

eGFR (ml/min per 1.73m2); LOA, Limits of Agreement.

bias = average of 322 (eGFR – iGFR) values, in ml/min per 1.73 m2

95% LOA = bias ± 1.96 · standard deviation of (eGFR – iGFR)

a

70.69(cystatin C)-0.931

b

75.94(cystatin C)-1.170; Am J Kidney Dis. 2006; 48:221-30.

c

91.62(cystatin C)-1.123; Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18:981-5.

d

-4.32 + 80.35(cystatin C)-1; Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2003; 18:2024-2031.