Table 4.
Parameters of the logistic regression analysis for variables predicting the adoption of supplementary feeding, use of veterinary services, vaccination and curative medical treatments across 210 urban and peri-urban farm households (HH) in the West African cities of Kano, Nigeria (84 HH), Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso (63 HH) and Sikasso, Mali (63 HH)
| Predictors | Parameters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE β | Wald’s χ 2 | df | p≤ | Odds ratio | |
| Adoption of supplementary feeding | ||||||
| Constant | −3.242 | 1.054 | 9.452 | 1 | 0.002 | n.a. |
| Site | 6.278 | 2 | 0.043 | |||
| Site 1 (Kano) | 0.087 | 1.069 | 0.007 | 1 | 0.935 | 1.091 |
| Site 2 (Bobo Dioulasso) | 1.787 | 0.885 | 4.709 | 1 | 0.043 | 5.970 |
| Species 1 (cattle) | 1.527 | 0.704 | 4.709 | 1 | 0.030 | 4.603 |
| Species 2 (small ruminant) | −1.072 | 0.704 | 2.322 | 1 | 0.128 | 0.342 |
| Species 3 (chicken) | −0.672 | 0.681 | 0.976 | 1 | 0.323 | 0.510 |
| Overall model evaluation (model χ 2) | 15.858 | 5 | 0.007 | |||
| Goodness-of-fit test (Homer and Lemeshow) | 10.222 | 7 | 0.176 | |||
| Use of veterinary services | ||||||
| Constant | −4.216 | 0.746 | 31.976 | 1 | 0.000 | n.a. |
| Site | 17.140 | 2 | 0.000 | |||
| Site 1 (Kano) | 1.164 | 0.669 | 3.021 | 1 | 0.082 | 3.201 |
| Site 2 (Bobo Dioulasso) | 2.937 | 0.747 | 15.444 | 1 | 0.000 | 18.854 |
| Species 1 (cattle) | 2.117 | 0.555 | 14.577 | 1 | 0.000 | 8.310 |
| Overall model evaluation (model χ 2) | 34.925 | 3 | 0.000 | |||
| Goodness-of-fit test (Hosmer and Lemeshow) | 5.577 | 4 | 0.233 | |||
| Curative medical treatment | ||||||
| Constant | −1.735 | 0.362 | 23.018 | 1 | 0.000 | n.a. |
| Site | 46.039 | 2 | 0.000 | |||
| Site 1 (Kano) | −2.440 | 1.071 | 5.194 | 1 | 0.023 | 0.087 |
| Site 2 (Bobo Dioulasso) | 2.833 | 0.502 | 31.862 | 1 | 0.000 | 17.000 |
| Overall model evaluation (model χ 2) | 81.710 | 2 | 0.000 | |||
| Goodness-of-fit test (Hosmer and Lemeshow) | 0.000 | 1 | 1.000 | |||
| Prophylactic vaccinations | ||||||
| Constant | 0.067 | 0.258 | 0.067 | 1 | 0.796 | n.a. |
| Site | 35.146 | 2 | 0.000 | |||
| Site 1 (Kano) | 4.108 | 1.040 | 15.593 | 1 | 0.000 | 60.806 |
| Site 2 (Bobo Dioulasso) | −2.121 | 0.541 | 15.384 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.120 |
| Overall model evaluation (model χ 2) | 104.979 | 2 | 0.000 | |||
| Goodness-of-fit test (Hosmer and Lemeshow) | 0.000 | 1 | 1.000 | |||
For explanation of parameters see “Data analysis” Section
n.a. not applicable