Table 2.
LOCATION | POINT MUTATION | Univ.Lig Affinity (nM ± SEM) | |
---|---|---|---|
Wild type hGRPR 0.1×106 | - | 0.10 ± 0.01 | |
42 | EC2 | L102A | 0.069 ± 0.003 |
43 | W106A | 0.083 ± 0.006 | |
44 | L107A | 0.17 ± 0.02* | |
45 | F108A | 0.14 ± 0.01 | |
46 | G109A | 0.050 ± 0.002 | |
47 | K114A | 0.15 ± 0.01* | |
48 | EC3 | F178A | 0.060 ± 0.032 |
49 | S211A | 0.11 ± 0.01 | |
50 | EC4 | S288T | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
51 | V294L | 0.17 ± 0.01* | |
52 | S297T | 0.091 ± 0.001 | |
53 | S297A | 0.18 ± 0.02* | |
54 | F301A | 0.17 ± 0.01* |
Group II (n=13) comprise point mutants made in a hGRPR amino acids which are present in all BnR’s with high affinity for [D-Tyr6, β-Ala11, Phe13, Nle14]Bn(6-14) [Univ.Lig] and in also in a similar position in hCCKAR, which has low affinity for [D-Tyr6, β-Ala11, Phe13, Nle14]Bn(6-14) [Univ.Lig] identified as described in Methods. Experiments were performed as described in Table 1 and Fig. 1 legend. The affinities (IC50) were calculated as described in Methods. Values are means ± SEM from three experiments for those mutants showing no affinity change and 4 to 6 experiments for any showing differences from control and in each experiment each point was measured in duplicate.
(in bold)=p<0.05 compared to wild type hGRPR expressed at similar expression levels.