Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Pharmacol. 2012 Jul 22;84(7):936–948. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.07.010

Table 2.

Affinities of hGRPR point mutants in Group II for [D-Tyr6, β-Ala11, Phe13, Nle14]Bn(6-14) [Univ.Lig]

LOCATION POINT MUTATION Univ.Lig Affinity (nM ± SEM)
Wild type hGRPR 0.1×106 - 0.10 ± 0.01
42 EC2 L102A 0.069 ± 0.003
43 W106A 0.083 ± 0.006
44 L107A 0.17 ± 0.02*
45 F108A 0.14 ± 0.01
46 G109A 0.050 ± 0.002
47 K114A 0.15 ± 0.01*
48 EC3 F178A 0.060 ± 0.032
49 S211A 0.11 ± 0.01
50 EC4 S288T 0.12 ± 0.02
51 V294L 0.17 ± 0.01*
52 S297T 0.091 ± 0.001
53 S297A 0.18 ± 0.02*
54 F301A 0.17 ± 0.01*

Group II (n=13) comprise point mutants made in a hGRPR amino acids which are present in all BnR’s with high affinity for [D-Tyr6, β-Ala11, Phe13, Nle14]Bn(6-14) [Univ.Lig] and in also in a similar position in hCCKAR, which has low affinity for [D-Tyr6, β-Ala11, Phe13, Nle14]Bn(6-14) [Univ.Lig] identified as described in Methods. Experiments were performed as described in Table 1 and Fig. 1 legend. The affinities (IC50) were calculated as described in Methods. Values are means ± SEM from three experiments for those mutants showing no affinity change and 4 to 6 experiments for any showing differences from control and in each experiment each point was measured in duplicate.

*

(in bold)=p<0.05 compared to wild type hGRPR expressed at similar expression levels.