Skip to main content
. 2012 May;29(5):682–689. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03605.x

Table 4.

Comparison of patient and physician belief and behaviour by country

Non-adherence** Dissatisfaction


Physician* Physician*


Country All patients*% and rank Specialist*% and rank Primary care % and rank All patients*% and rank Specialist*% and rank Primary care % and rank

China 33.3% 5 80.0% 4 68.0% 4 7.3%§ 5 28.0% 2 18.0% 4
France 19.4% 8 70.0% 6 52.0% 7 3.1%§ 7 16.0% 6 18.0% 5
Germany 39.8% 4 96.0% 1 86.0% 2 2.1%§ 8 8.0% 7 26.0% 2
Japan 43.8% 1 74.0% 5 58.0% 6 21.5% 2 32.0% 1 36.0% 1
Spain 22.5% 7 56.0% 7 40.0% 8 9.9% 3 12.0% 3 14.0% 6
Turkey 24.1% 6 58.0% 8 64.0% 5 22.5%§ 1 6.0% 8 10.0% 8
UK 41.4% 3 96.0% 1 78.0% 3 4.7%§ 6 20.0% 5 22.0% 3
USA 41.9% 2 90.0% 3 94.0% 1 8.4% 4 12.0% 4 12.0% 7
Total 33.2% 77.5% 67.5% 10.0%§ 17.0% 19.5%
*

Responses in this study populations differ significantly by country (P < 0.05).

No significant differences between patients with Type 1 diabetes and those with Type 2 diabetes.

Responses for specialist and primary care physicians differ significantly (P < 0.05).

§

Responses for patients and specialist physicians differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Responses for patients and primary care physicians differ significantly (P < 0.05).

**

For non-adherence, absolute percentages reported for physicians cannot be compared with percentage of patients who report insulin non-adherence because physicians report whether ‘any of your typical patients fail to take their insulin as prescribed’ rather than the percentage of their patients who have missed their dose or fail to take their insulin exactly as prescribed; rank order of countries for patients and physicians can be compared.